Showing posts with label James Madison. Show all posts
Showing posts with label James Madison. Show all posts

Saturday, January 1, 2011

Georgia Bulldogs: Mark Richt Has An "Entitlement" Problem

ATHENS, GA - NOVEMBER 27: Head coach Mark Richt of the Georgia Bulldogs celebrates their 42-34 win over the Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets at Sanford Stadium on November 27, 2010 in Athens, Georgia. (Photo by Kevin C. Cox/Getty Images)Here's what Georgia head coach, Mark Richt, had to say following the team's loss to Central Florida, "We didn’t want to finish with a loss, we didn’t want to finish with a losing record. No one would have really predicted that, but it is what it is, as they say." 

"It is what it is"...that's the best you can do, coach? I'll tell you this much, this game did nothing to get people excited about Georgia's ability to rebound in 2011 and this staff hasn't shown enough urgency in making the necessary changes to get this program back on the winning track.

The very definition of what this team could be in the future was expressed on the opening offensive drive of the game when Richt elected to kick a field goal, on Central Florida's 2-yard line, instead of going for it on 4th-and-1.

It was as if Richt said, 'I'm willing to settle. You took our best shot—you win'. However, as a fan you're talking at the television, screaming even, because you cannot believe what you are seeing. Then, suddenly, the ugly truth starts to creep in—the line can't do it. 

This offensive line—with its budding NFL prospects—doesn't have the leg drive or the upper body strength to assist our running backs in netting one measly yard.

How depressing is that?


Then you start to understand that there are no more "gimme" games, and no reason for you to believe this team is capable of winning against even the least of its competition. However, that's just the negativity talking. Luckily for you, the team doesn't feel that way about themselves. 

Georgia kicker Blair Walsh made it clear that this team still feels like the one voted No. 1 at the start of the 2008 season. These guys still feel as if their presence alone is enough to scare teams into submission. They entered this game under the notion that they should have been able to win,
"Our attitude needs to change. We’re not entitled to win any games. Even though it was UCF, it was Conference USA, I think we felt like we were entitled to win this game. We can’t feel that way. They’re a great team, they absolutely are. But we need to play better and win. At the end of the day you’re playing football, you’re not playing conference, and which conference is better."
The message in that is this: 'Don't worry about the guys in the uniforms, this is (insert conference here) and—on paper—we're better than they are, so don't bother preparing for the possibility of a loss. We got this'.

If that's the case, maybe they should go back and ask Michigan how embarrassed they felt after losing to Appalachian State, or how shocked Virginia Tech was when they lost to James Madison, or how much of a wake-up call it must have been for Notre Dame to lose to Tulsa.

Entitled?...Really? 6-6 makes you feel "entitled" to win football games—ay yi yi—it's any wonder  these guys have so much time to post comments on Facebook and Twitter, or operate a Ustream account—they are basing their wins on what they "should" be able to do and not what they should be doing.

Good to know.

However, if you see this game as just another isolated incident—with no particular trend in the making—you could easily find a scapegoat.  Blame Mark Richt for his lack of passion, blame Mike Bobo for his unimaginative game-planning, blame Aaron Murray for wearing gloves, blame the offensive line for being deplorable, blame Stacy Searles  (the offensive line coach) for not having the o-line prepared, blame A.J. Green for thinking ahead to the NFL, or blame the entire team for having the audacity to feel "entitled".

Pick any of the above and you'd hardly find a person to fault you for your thought process.

Blair Walsh talked about a "culture change" being on the horizon, but shouldn't that have started in 2008—after the team was decimated by the Crimson Tide in the infamous 'Blackout'? Or in 2009 when the Tennessee Volunteers took them to the woodshed? Or how about this season, after Mississippi State manhandled them in Starkville?

How much more proof does this team need that they aren't "entitled" to anything?

If you're a Georgia fan, how can you be encouraged by this team's prospects for 2011 based on what you saw? And, if you've been like me—a Richt apologist through even the toughest of times—at what point do you start to wonder if he can really turn this thing around?

2010 is history but, after that loss, it's hard to see much better on the horizon for 2011. 

Here's hoping the skeptic in me is proved wrong. Happy New Year!




Monday, September 13, 2010

College Football: You Ain't A Contender!—Heisman Hopefuls Who Flopped on Saturday

One of my favorite all-time Marlon Brando films is On The Waterfront. The movie, in essence, is about a promising young fighter who isn't able to live up to his potential and spends his life underachieving. It's a great movie and one of the best scenes in the movie is the one where Brando's character finally comes to grips with what he "coulda been":



Now, you might be asking, "what on earth does this have to do with this article, Lady?!?

Well, entering the 2010 season, it was easy to pick out the names of the guys who could have been contenders for the Heisman this year: Jacory Harris, Christian Ponder, Mark Ingram, Ryan Mallett, and Jacquizz Rodgers were all early favorites to get the nod.

Well, after Saturday, it became clear that some of these guys aren't ready for that kind of shine. If they were, they could have proven it on Saturday, instead, they were just bums.

1. Jacory Harris, QB—Miami

Just when you thought it was safe to go back in the water, the talented Cane' with the money-in-the-bank arm, decided to go from Jacory Harris to Harris Teeter. His awful showing against Ohio State this weekend all but erases him from contention as all he proved was that he wasn't ready to lead Miami into anything—unless obscurity counts.

vs. Ohio State: 22-of-39, 232 yards, 1 touchdown, and 4 interceptions



2. Mark Ingram, RB—Alabama

It's not that Ingram has done anything to screw up his Heisman chances, it's the fact that Ingram hasn't done anything. For the second time, in as many weeks, Ingram hasn't been in the lineup for Alabama. He's been working through an injury and unable to play.

Unfortunately, for him, Trent Richardson has filled in quite nicely in his absence—making him all but irrelevant in the minds of many.

2010 Stats: 0 carries, 0 yards, and 0 touchdowns

3. Christian Ponder, QB—Florida State

The Christian Ponder love parade started in Tallahassee and ended in Norman. Ponder, the mobile quarterback with the nice arm and the nimble feet, left his game in Florida as the Oklahoma defense harassed and harangued the senior quarterback into a mistake-laden game filled with miscues and uneven play—on both sides of the ball.

vs. Oklahoma: 11-of-28, 113 yards, and 2 interceptions.



4. Josh Nesbitt, QB—Georgia Tech

In two weeks of play, against less than impressive opposition, the Yellow Jackets have proven two things: their defense isn't there yet, and their offense is suspect minus Jonathan Dwyer and Demaryius Thomas. Nesbitt was being pushed into the Heisman limelight by Georgia Tech, but has fallen flat so far.

The ultimate low, so far, a road loss to a struggling Kansas Jayhawk squad that, one week prior, loss to North Dakota State.

vs. Kansas: 5-of-15, for 116 yards, and 1 touchdown


Ryan Williams, RB—Virginia Tech

Williams was a bit of a longshot to begin with, but he was definitely on the radar. However, after Virginia Tech's embarrassing loss to James Madison on Saturday, it would be tough to imagine anyone from this Hokies team getting a nod for anything at all.

vs. James Madison: 20 carries, 91 yards, and 0 touchdowns
Enhanced by Zemanta

Sunday, September 12, 2010

Boise State Can't Catch A Break: Virginia Tech Loses to I-AA Opponent James Madison

On September 6th, the match-up between the Boise State Broncos and the Virginia Tech Hokies was being billed as one of the premier games of the season.

Both teams were ranked in the Top 10, Boise at No. 3, and Virginia Tech was considered be just the quality opponent Boise needed to spruce up its BCS resume.

The game ended with Boise victorious, and the media frenzy around their legitimacy began to kick into high gear. This game was supposed to be proof to the nation that Boise State was not just some small conference school from the WAC, but a legitimate player in the BCS—it proved, once and for all, that the Broncos were "for real".

Well, a funny thing happened on the way to the BCS party, that big win over Virginia Tech in week one started to accumulate question marks. As predicted, the requisite doubts about the quality of the Virginia Tech team Boise State played began to come into question.

Was Virginia Tech they really that good? Should they honestly have been ranked in the Top 10? The Hokies made a nice comeback, but their overall play wasn't really all that impressive—was it? Wasn't this just a case of the Broncos taking advantage of a team that should have been considered in rebuild mode?

If you are a Boise State fan, all of the above probably sounded like more excuses.  Just a few more justifications for why a BCS team didn't perform, and why Boise State will never be good enough to be considered a major player.

Heck, even Nick Saban (Alabama's head coach), went on his radio show to talk about how a team should be judged by their body of work, not just a couple big games here and there—tsk, tsk, tsk.

The debate rages on about Boise's legitimacy but one question has been answered in a fairly resounding way about the opponent they faced September 6th— in Virginia Tech—and that answer is they simply aren't very good.

As a follow-up to their last second loss to Boise in week one, the Hokies went out and laid an egg against James Madison—in Blacksburg! James Madison, in case you don't know, is a I-AA team. They play in the Colonial Athletic Association (CAA) and they ended last season with a 6-5 record.

Virginia Tech scored 16-points against them on Saturday (wrap your head around that for a moment). Tyrod Taylor and company couldn't manage more than 16-points against a Division I-AA team, at home, just one week removed from playing one of the biggest games of the season—pathetic.

People can call it a letdown for a team that was still smarting over such a disappointing loss to Boise, on such a major stage.  Fine, we can buy that for a dollar and a nice pair of BCS boxers but, in the end, it's all BS because what viewers will see is an overrated Virginia Tech team that was prematurely billed as a quality opponent.

How will this affect the Boise State BCS train? Hard to say, but it doesn't look good right now.

Here's a look at the catastrophe that was Virginia Tech in week two—does this look like a Top 10 team to you?


Enhanced by Zemanta