Showing posts with label Special Features. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Special Features. Show all posts

Monday, May 16, 2011

Talkin' Trilogies - Issue #4 - The "High School Musical" Trilogy

Luke Owen charts the 'High School Musical' trilogy...

No wait! Come back!

Alright, so this may hardly be “one of the greatest trilogies of all time”, however I once again refer to my original post and my rules:

1. It has to be a trilogy

And like it or not, this is a trilogy of films.

Now, don’t think that I am reviewing this series of films to bad mouth them. Quite the contrary in fact, I actually like these films. And with this issue of Talkin’ Trilogies, I hope to show you why.

So, let us take a trip back to 2006 where the Disney Channel was getting ready to premiere a film that, unbeknownst to them, was going to take over the world.

High School Musical (Ortega, 2006)

When unknown writer Peter Barsocchini wrote the screenplay for High School Musical, I’m sure he had no idea what effect it would have on his career. The only thing he had written of note prior to High School Musical was the 1994 Wesley Snipes / Gary Busey movie Drop Zone. “It’s just one of those projects where the planets sort of lined up from day one” he told the L.A Times on August 26th 2007.

Rumour has it that High School Musical actually started life out in 1999 as the proposed sequel/reboot of Grease, tentatively titled Grease 3, which would feature the children of Danny, Sandy and other members of the original cast. The project was shelved after several re-writes in 2004 and according to the IMDB.com trivia page the basic plot remained the same when it was carried over to High School Musical. However, I can find no interviews or articles that confirm or deny these claims, so it’s all hearsay.

“I thought it would be really fun to write a Disney Channel movie that my daughter could watch” he told Written By in 2007. “Because two of the other things I was working on were going to be R rated” he continued, “and High School Musical was a totally different experience”.

The story focuses around two central characters, Captain of the basketball team Troy Bolton and Gabriella Montez, the bookish nerd who have a chance meeting on the last night of a holiday break. The pair are thrown up on to a stage and are forced to sing, where they both discover that they can not only both sing very well, they both secretly love it. As luck would have it, Gabriella has now moved to the same school as Troy which would allow their romance to bloom. The pair audition for the duet role in the schools winter musical and get the parts – but now they have to lead double lives as neither of their respective clubs will allow them to do both.

Taking influences from musicals like Grease and Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet, Barsocchini weaved together an entertaining if a little basic script. The characters are very clichéd, the dialogue is stilted and the plot is incredibly standard. It has one simple message, “do what you want to do, not what society deems you to do”, which can be found in many Disney productions. However, despite these negative criticisms, the film was accepted on first draft. “It was the first time in my career, and probably the last time, that a company greenlit the first draft… they said, ‘we really like it and we’re sending it to directors” he told Written By, “and I said, ‘the first draft?!’” The first director they sent the script to was a man named Kenny Ortega, who would go on to take the job.

Ortega had a few soirees in the world of directing, but his real calling card was his work as a choreographer in the 1980s for films such as Dirty Dancing, Pretty in Pink and Ferris Bueller’s Day Off. As well as bringing Barsocchini’s script to life, Ortega also took on the role of choreographing the dance sequences for the film along with Charles “Chuckie” Kaplow. “Kenny [was a] real stickler for choreographing for the camera” he said at a Q & A session for the Choreography Media Awards in 2009, “There was one day when we we’re working on the basketball number and I had done the choreography for the basketball team, Kenny was in another room with another group. He came in and he saw what we had done and the first thing he said was, ‘where is the camera’”. Ortega could have just shot these dance numbers as flashy music video style segments, however because he cared about the project and wanted to succeed, he really put in the effort so that the film would look like a proper movie rather than a cheap made for TV effort.

Now, you could read that and say that Ortega pushed High School Musical into a film that is all style and no substance – a beautiful shell with an empty core. And at the very base of the film, it is. Despite Ortega’s efforts, the main problems with the script could not be overcome. The dialogue is hokey and the story is clichéd and basic. However where Ortega succeeds in making the film a fun experience - which was the entire point of the film. High School Musical is a fun film. The songs are catchy, the choreography is great and it looks as good as a made for TV movie can look. Having said that, there is one thing that really brings the film to life – its cast.

Ortega made the decision to cast complete of mostly unknowns with the exception of Ashley Tisdale who had some success from the role of Maddie Fitzpatrick in Disney’s The Suite Life of Zack and Cody. Either the casting process was incredibly thorough or they got very lucky as they managed to cast an incredibly charismatic bunch of actors. Most notably the afore mentioned Ashley Tisdale who plays drama bitch Sharpay Evans, Corbin Bleu as basketball jock Chad Danforth and the ever charming Zac Efron who took on the lead role.

What is interesting about Efron is that this was the role that catapulted him into the megastar he is today. However, for a film that involves a lot of singing, Efron himself barely sang a note. Because Ortega deemed his voice too low for that of a tenor and his voice was over dubbed by actor and singer Andrew Seeley who also tested for the role of Troy. This leads me to believe that Efron was not cast for his voice but for his looks and his natural charisma. A smart move as Zac Efron was, in my mind, one of the leading contributors to the success of High School Musical. Noted director Gus Van Saant wrote in Interview Magazine in 2008, “Efron radiates a sort of well-scrubbed mannishness. He’s an entertainer in the most traditional sense of the word.”

The made for TV movie premiered on the Disney Channel on January 20th 2006 to a record breaking audience of 7.7 million viewers. Since then, it has been seen globally by 225 million people. A staggering amount for a TV movie that was made for $4.2 million, which is low in the world of Disney TV, to fill a time slot.

The success of High School Musical was instant and its popularity was huge. The DVD shifted 1.2 million copies in the first 6 days and was the second Disney Channel Original Movie to be certified platinum. By August, the soundtrack had sold more than 3 million copies and was number one on the Billboard 200 chart twice. The film spawned a series of books, dolls and a ton of other merchandise as well as a worldwide concert tour, an on stage musical and an ice show.

For me, High School Musical is a mixed bag of affairs. While the songs are incredibly catchy and the film the choreography is top notch, the plot lacks any credibility and a lot of the acting is very wooden. The young cast do have a very natural sense about them, but Vanessa Hudgens in particular falls flat on screen. But this was a made for TV movie and I’m not expecting The Shawshank Redemption here.

With all of this popularity, it would have been foolish for Disney not to commission a sequel. And commission one they did.

High School Musical 2 (Ortega, 2007)

“When [High School Musical] executive producer Bill Borden and I were talking [about the sequel], I said, 'What's the greatest day of the year for a kid? Let's turn the page. Let's not do what's expected. Let's start it on the last day of school.'” Barsocchini told Richard Stayton in the September 2007 issue of Written By. “I had summer jobs” he continued, “not that kids today get summer jobs, you know, because it's harder for them. But I said that would be a fun thing, and Disney was like, 'Okay.'”

So Barsocchini was going the Are You Being Served? route by taking characters out of the comfort zone we’ve grown to know them in and putting them into a foreign environment. This tends to happen with TV to movie adaptations (see the afore mentioned Are You Being Served?, Kevin and Perry Go Large, Sex and the City 2 etc.) and this tactic is usually because the comfort zone has outstayed its welcome. However, this was not the case with High School Musical 2, but as Barsocchini said, “let’s not do what’s expected”. It was a bold move as audiences had built up a perception of what High School Musical as an entity meant. They may have just wanted to see more of the same rather than taking a 180 degree turn. Zac Efron didn’t see it that way however stating in his August 2007 interview with Rolling Stone Magazine, “In the first movie, you got to meet the characters of High School Musical. In the second movie you get to join the ride”.

High School Musical 2 takes place at the end of the Wildcats first year together as friends and they are preparing for their summer holiday. The only problem is Troy needs to get some money to be able to pay for his college tuition fees. Meanwhile, Sharpay has plans to steal Troy from Gabriella by giving him a job at the country club that her parents own. What she didn’t count on however was Troy bringing the rest of the Wildcats with him.

Bottom line, High School Musical 2 is a vast improvement on the original film. The production looks better, the acting is better and most importantly for the genre, the songs are better. The overall scale of the film feels less ‘made for TV’ like its predecessor even though this was still made for the television market. Much like with the first film, the basic plot and dialogue is carried by the excellent cast of charismatic youngsters. Corbin Bleu really steps up his game as does the rest of the cast, but its Lucas Brabeel that makes the biggest improvement from the two films by stepping out from the shadows and into the forefront. The true stars of the show once again however are Zac Efron (who actually sings this time) and Ashley Tisdale.

Whilst watching this film through again recently, I made the discovery that without Tisdale’s superb telling of Sharpay’s tale, I probably wouldn’t like this film or indeed the series as much as I do. She gives undoubtedly the best performance in the second movie and steals almost every scene she is in. Her annoying habits and tendencies are highlighted beautifully by Lucas Grabeel’s performance as her brother Ryan who is the perfect counterpart. Tisdale’s beauty and charisma really bring the character from being a clichéd bitch antagonist to easily the best character of the franchise. What makes this a bad thing however is that, as an audience member, I’m not supposed to like her. When she gets her comeuppance at the end of the film, I genuinely feel bad for her which I’m certain was the not the intended point.

Despite my overall praise for High School Musical 2, I do have one reservation against the film which is the case of inconstancy regarding the actual musical side of the film. Edgar Wright said in an interview with DVD Review regarding the fights in Scott Pilgrim vs. The World, “When the emotion is too great to convey in mere words, characters in a musical will sing out.” This works in the case of movies like Grease or Little Shop of Horrors where they use the musical number to move the story forward. However in the world of High School Musical, they don’t just sing to move the plot or build characters, they also sing in shows as part of the story. This creates a bizarre world in which Chad Danforth dances around singing with his friends only to then have a conversation with Ryan about how he hates dancing and singing. Which is then followed by a song in the film sung by Chad called ‘I Don’t Dance’ during which he does an elaborate dance number. It doesn’t make sense and is horrendously inconsistent.

With that one complaint aside, High School Musical 2 is again a very fun film. Much like the first film, it was trying not to be a cinematic masterpiece. It set out to be a fun way to spend an hour and a half and it succeeds on every single level. This is encapsulated by the final number of the film, ‘All For One’ sung by the entire cast. There is such an overwhelming sense of fun and enjoyment and the cast (including a blink and you’ll miss it cameo from Miley Cyrus) look like they are having a blast. This delight is portrayed so well that you can’t help but smile.

Premiering on August 17th 2007, High School Musical 2 brought in a 17.2 million viewers which was not only a Disney Channel record, it was also the most watched basic-cable television show at the time beating out Monday Night Football’s display of the New York Giants and the Dallas Cowboys in 2006. Over the premier weekend, the show totalled at a staggering 33.04 million viewers. The success of the sequel, and the franchise, could not be denied.

As I said earlier, I think High School Musical 2 surpasses the first film in every respect however I appear to be in the minority. HSM2 has the lowest Rotten Tomatoes score as well as the lowest IMDB.com rating. Phil Null of filmcritic.com said upon the DVDs release in 2008, “[High School Musical 2] lacks the sizzle and originality that made the first film so popular... The songs in this instalment are nowhere near the quality of those in the original, but they work well enough.”

The writing was on the wall, High School Musical was not a one trick pony, it was not a happy accident and more importantly, it was not a fluke. High School Musical was quickly becoming a billion dollar franchise. Imagine what sort of money could be made if the series took to the silver screen...

High School Musical 3: Senior Year (Ortega, 2008)

In the history of cinema, the usual course of franchise movies that overstay their welcome on the big screen is for them to move to a straight to DVD release. High School Musical is the exception to the rule however by making the transition from made-for-TV-movie to big screen adaptation with a large scale production and budget.

High School Musical 3: Senior Year is, as the title would suggest, about the graduating year for the Wildcats. With such a huge part of their lives coming to an end, it’s now up to the kids to make the decisions that will take them into adulthood. The main issue of which is whether Troy wants to follow his dream of being a pro basketball player or following his heart and study the performing arts. On top of that, the Wildcats are preparing for their final ever production at East High School simply titled, ‘Senior Year’.

Returning again to pen the script for the third instalment was Peter Barsocchini who said in an interview with movieweb.com, “the first thing when approaching High School Musical 3, knowing it was going to be a theatrical [release] – you literally have a bigger screen to work with. So conceiving musical numbers and the scale of what we did and approaching to do was expanding.” So, the big question surrounding High School Musical 3: Senior Year is whether the transition from small to silver screen was a smooth one. While HSM3 is a good film, it does often feel like an over polished TV movie. However, you cannot fault them on upping the scale of the production.

Where High School Musical 3: Senior Year falls down in my book is the plot points that have just been carried over from the first two films. Troy has to decide whether he wants to act or play ball just like he did in the first film and Gabriella has to decide whether she wants to stay in East High with Troy or “go her own way” as she did in High School Musical 2. Even if this is some people’s first view into the world of High School Musical, Barsocchini should have tried to implement newer plot threads instead of re-hashing old ones. He talked about the scale of production in the afore mentioned interview and that seems to have taken precedent over the actual plot, story and character development. Whereas the first two movies where trying to be something a little bit different from other musicals, High School Musical 3: Senior Year just feels like any other teen musical. Even worse, it just feels like another entry into the franchise and nothing special.

Not to say that High School Musical 3: Senior Year is a bad movie because it’s actually really fun. The songs are still catchy, the mood is high and the choreography is excellent. While I don’t think it’s the best one of the series, it really holds itself up compared to its predecessors. I mentioned the ending of High School Musical 2 with the big end number that highlights the essence of fun the film exudes, well High School Musical 3 also has this big number to cap off the film. This one though is actually quite poignant when you look at the lyrics:

High School Musical
Who says we have to let it go?
It's the best part we've ever known
Step into the future...but hold on to
High School Musical
Let's celebrate where we come from
The friends who've been there all along
Just like... from High School Musical

This can be seen one of two ways. One of those ways being that this song is a wonderful way to celebrate the end of the series. It is a way for the cast members to show their appreciation for the filmmakers taking them from unknowns to major players. Or you could look at it as Disney saying, “We made you and don’t you forget it!” For me, I think this a great way to end the franchise, even if it is a little self-masturbatory. It’s nice to see this cast of characters I’ve grown to love go their own separate ways and out of my life.

This is truly one of the great things about the High School Musical trilogy, which is that the franchise was written and directed by the same people and it features the same cast. It means by the third film they have all gelled together which means they will put out a better product. However, there was one cast member that nearly missed this entry...

On September 6th 2007, nude photos of Vanessa Hudgens were leaked onto the internet and shared throughout the world. Not only was Hudgens’ squeaky clean image tarnished, Disney’s almost impeccable reputation was under threat. On October 17th 2007, OK! Magazine published a story that claimed Disney were done with Hudgens and that they didn’t want her to be in the movie. The article reads, “OK! can exclusively report that Disney has made up its mind about what to do next and that the 18-year-old actress will not be asked to board the boat for the third HSM film. ‘Disney finally decided that they don’t want her back,’ an insider reveals to OK!. ‘They feel that as long as Zac Efron is in the movie, all will be fine.’” However, on the same day, Access Hollywood posted a story which confirmed that Hudgens was still in negotiations with Disney for her role and that they were not going to drop her. Hudgens’ rep said, “totally untrue. It’s an old rumour. OK! Magazine was having a slow news day”. On the 24th October 2008, Hudgens did an interview with The Daily Mirror in which she said, “I think that everything happens for a reason and I wouldn’t take back anything I’ve done. I don’t like talking about it because it was something that was meant to be private and I’d still like to keep it as private as I can.”

Despite the negative press this put on the film, it was always bound to be a success. Premiering on October 24th 2008, High School Musical 3: Senior Year beat out Saw V in box office weekend takings by drawing in $42 million in the US alone and in total has brought in over $250 million dollars. Reviews were mixed with some critics downright hating the film while others enjoyed it. Tim Robey of the Daily Telegraph said that, “[when] refitted for the big screen, it becomes an eerily plastic business, like a blown-up dolls house”. David Jenkins of Time Out said “the bottom line is, if you’ve not already booked tickets for the entire family, think twice before being caught up in the hype. At best, you’ll be disappointed; at worst, you’ll want to blow up a high school.” Mark Kemode said in his review that he heard other critics “audibly tutting” in disapproval. However, Kermode was among many top critics who actually liked the film. He went on to say in his review that, “I’m going to leap to its defence, I really enjoyed it” and to claim that it would be in his top 5 of that year. Mark Olson of the L.A Times said, “The HSM series has always been playful and high-spirited, with a refreshing emphasis on collective action and the importance of group effort over the individual, and there's nothing in High School Musical 3: Senior Year to upset the formula.”

So, with a now billion dollar franchise under the belt, it will come as a surprise to those not in the know is that this is where the High School Musical story ends.

High School Musical 4 and spin-offs

It seems very odd for a company like Disney to just pull the plug on a franchise, especially one that is this hot. In High School Musical 3: Senior Year we were introduced to a whole host of new characters that would in effect be “the next generation” of High School Musical. I’m not sure whether audiences reacted negatively to them or whether they couldn’t get a script right, but these characters were never seen or heard from again. Since the final films release, all talk of a fourth instalment as pretty much died of death and it’s looking more and more likely that we have seen the end of this franchise.

That was until this year when the straight to DVD release of Sharpay’s Fabulous Adventure, a spin off movie featuring Ashley Tisdale as Sharpay pursuing a career on Broadway. Now, I’ve not seen this movie so I can’t pass judgment on it, however being that Sharpay was the best thing from all three movies, I would be more than happy to give this a go.

Recently I wrote some reviews for the Roger Corman produced monster movies Sharktopus and Dinoshark. In those reviews, I wrote that the films “could have been a good little tongue in cheek monster movie that would do quite well among B-Movie fans. However, these titles keep getting put in the hands of incompetent filmmakers who don’t know one end of a camera from another, let alone how to make an entertaining film.” This is a key point I bring up when I am jumping to the defence of High School Musical. Ortega and his team weren’t trying to change the world; they were looking to entertain it. Much like Sharktopus and Dinoshark, the High School Musical series was a straight to DVD affair that was just intended to make its money back. However, because the filmmakers cast a group of enthusiastic actors, they brought in a writer who wanted to write a fun script and they had a director with a clue they ended up with a not only an incredibly entertaining film, but a impressively successful one too.
“We need to save our show from people who don't know the difference between a Tony Award and Tony Hawk.” – Sharpay Evans, High School Musical (Ortega, 2006)
Luke Owen

Sunday, May 1, 2011

Cinematic Highlights: New Releases in May 2011

A run-down of all the big cinema releases coming to the UK this May…



Movie of the Month - Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides



Johnny Depp returns as Captain Jack Sparrow in the fourth instalment of Walt Disney’s blockbuster Pirates of the Caribbean series (and the first to be released in 3D), with Rob Marshall (Chicago) stepping in to take over directorial duties from Gore Verbinski. The action-packed adventure takes inspiration from Tim Powers’ 1988 novel On Stranger Tides and sees Captain Jack crossing paths with the enigmatic Angelica (Penélope Cruz), daughter of the fearsome pirate Blackbeard (Ian McShane), on a quest to find the fabled Fountain of Youth. Also featuring in the cast are Geoffrey Rush, Kevin McNally, Richard Griffiths, Stephen Graham, Judi Dench, Greg Ellis, Damian O’Hare, Gemma Ward, Roger Allam and Keith Richards.



Release Date – May 18th





Coming soon to a cinema near you…



13 Assassins (May 6th)



Prolific Japanese director Takashi Miike (Audition, Ichi the Killer) turns his hand to period samurai epic for this action-packed tale of a group of assassins on a suicide mission to kill a sadistic lord. Read our review here.



Hanna (May 6th)



Raised by her father (Eric Bana) to become the world’s most lethal assassin, a teenage girl (Saoirse Ronan) finds herself on the run from Cate Blanchett’s corrupt CIA agent in this action thriller from Joe Wright (Atonement). Watch the trailer here.



Priest (May 6th)



Director Scott Charles Stewart (Legion) adapts Min-Woo Hyung’s Korean post-apocalyptic comic series. Paul Bettany stars as a priest who sets out into the wastelands on a rescue mission after his niece (Lily Collins) is kidnapped by vampires.



Something Borrowed (May 6th)



Luke Greenfield (The Girl Next Door) directs Kate Hudson, Ginnifer Goodwin, John Krasinski and Colin Egglesfield in this romantic comedy based on American author Emily Griffin’s 2004 novel of the same name.



Water for Elephants (May 6th)



A veterinary student (Robert Pattinson) joins a circus troupe after a family tragedy and finds himself falling for the star attraction (Reese Witherspoon), who happens to be trapped in an unhappy marriage with the circus ringmaster (Christoph Waltz).



Attack the Block (May 13th)



British comedian Joe Cornish makes his directorial debut with Attack the Block, a sci-fi comedy that sees a gang of South London youths defending themselves from an alien invasion. Executive-produced by Edgar Wright (Shaun of the Dead), with a supporting turn from Nick Frost.



Red Hill (May 13th)



The debut of Australian writer-director Patrick Hughes, Red Hill is a modern-day Western that sees a young police officer squaring off with a brutal murderer looking to exact revenge on those who put him behind bars.



Take Me Home Tonight (May 13th)



Topher Grace, Anna Faris, Dan Fogler and Teresa Palmer star in this 80s-set comedy from director Michael Dowse (It’s All Gone Pete Tong) and writers Jeff and Jackie Filgo (That ‘70s Show).



The Way (May 13th)



Emilio Estevez writes, directs, and stars alongside his father Martin Sheen in The Way, an inspirational drama about a doctor (Sheen) who sets off on a pilgrimage along the Camino de Santiago to retrieve the body of his adult son.



Blitz (May 20th)



Jason Statham is a tough British police detective on the hunt for a serial killer in this thriller from director Elliot Lester (Love is the Drug). Based on Ken Bruen’s 2002 novel, Blitz also stars Paddy Considine, Aidan Gillen, Mark Rylance and David Morrissey. Watch the trailer here.



Julia’s Eyes (May 20th)



A Spanish horror from director Guillem Morales (The Uncertain Guest) and producer Guillermo del Toro (Pan’s Labyrinth) about a young woman (Belen Rueda) investigating the apparent suicide of her sister while suffering a degenerative eye disease that sees her slowly losing her sight.



Win Win (May 20th)



Thomas McCarthy (The Station Agent) directs Paul Giamatti in this comedy about a struggling lawyer and part-time high-school wrestling coach who hopes to solve his financial problems with the discovery of a star athlete.



Diary of a Wimpy Kid: Roderick Rules (May 27th)



Zachary Gordon, Robert Capron, Rachael Harris, Steve Zahn and Devon Bostick reprise their roles for a sequel to 2010’s Diary of a Wimpy Kid, directed by British filmmaker David Bowers (Astro Boy).



The Hangover Part II (May 27th)



Director Todd Phillips and stars Bradley Cooper, Zach Galifianakis and Justin Bartha hit Bangkok for Ed Helms’ wedding in the sequel to the 2009 hit comedy The Hangover.



If we’ve missed anything off the list do let us know…

Thursday, April 28, 2011

Macho Antidotes to the Royal Wedding – Part 3: Bargain DVDs – Trainspotting and The Wrestler

Liam Trim provides some alternatives to the Royal Wedding in the third of a three part feature...

The big day is upon us. The masculine apocalypse is now. The horsemen will round the corner towards Westminster Abbey any moment, dragging their cargo of the merry middle class and nostalgic Eton boy politicians, right into our living rooms. Oh my god it’s not long until we get to see Kate’s dress!

Shoot me now. I am apprehensive, a little scared even, because I may have been advocating alternatives to the big day but I know I’m fighting an entity so vast that it will inevitably stray into my line of sight at some point. I won’t be able to flee the hordes living and breathing the ceremony like it was their own. It wouldn’t even do any good to flee abroad, if anything they’re more marriage mad than the most devout British Royalist. So I definitely cannot outrun this and in addition I have another problem. I can’t hide from it either, because I’ve already consumed the alternatives in order to point them out to all of you. Blokes, guys and lads everywhere, I hope you appreciate my sacrifice.

We’ve reached the final alternative step and its one I like to think of as the emergency measure. Thor at the cinema requires venturing out and a on iPlayer requires dangerous proximity to internet coverage, but these two films on DVD, available on the bargain shelves of any local high street, merely need a TV. I know, believe me I know, the wedding is on all the channels. But if you have an even more serious aversion to confetti and vows than me, just pull the aerial out and stick these two very manly films in to play, one after another.

Firstly then a film I’ve been meaning to see for a long while, the Scottish breakthrough piece for Danny Boyle, Trainspotting. Despite all the hype, from critics and friends alike, I really didn’t know what to expect from this exactly. I knew there was drug taking, in all likelihood sex, and an awful lot of accented foul language. I knew it starred an emaciated Ewan McGregor. I knew it would have both fun and filth. I knew Boyle’s playful style would scrawl a signature in every scene. I wasn’t expecting it to be quite so hilarious and true to life as it was.

Much of the humour comes from the characters of McGregor’s Mark Renton’s “so called mates”. Johnny Lee Miller, now starring fifteen years on in Boyle’s critically acclaimed Frankenstein opposite Benedict Cumberbatch in the theatre, plays a Sean Connery obsessed, seemingly streetwise fellow crack addict. His assessments of Connery’s performances as James Bond and his astonishing grasp of box office data, were particularly surreal for a fellow Bond fan like me, as he helped friends to inject heroin. He turns out to be far less clued up than he pretends to be though. Then there’s Spud, a guy who is very plainly clueless from the start, who lands up throwing his shit all over his girlfriend’s family at breakfast. Don’t ask how. Slapstick perhaps, but I laughed for several minutes.

There’s also Tommy, a guy McGregor’s surprisingly appealing narration informs us has the fault of being honest and not addicted to any banned substance. I assume the visceral poetry of Renton’s narration is so attractive because it is transplanted largely untouched from Irvine Walsh’s novel, which is infamous for its use of Scottish dialect. A scene where Tommy and Spud discuss the pitfalls of their respective women at a club, and the girlfriends do likewise about the boys in the toilets, presumably also has its roots in the book. But it’s wonderfully adapted by Boyle, with subtitles not quite necessary because of the noise and very capable comic acting depicting the darkly funny give and take realities of relationships.

Finally there’s a young Kelly Macdonald, who has since appeared in No Country For Old Men, in her first film. Renton catches sight of her in a club as she’s leaving, with his sex drive rapidly returning as he attempts to give up his habit. He follows her outside, as his narration tells us he’s fallen in love, and tries it on with her. She confidently shoots him down, only to snog his face off in the taxi and subsequently shag him rampantly in her room. In the morning Renton discovers she’s a schoolgirl, and the people he presumes to be flatmates are her parents. It’s the sort of cheeky scene present throughout the film but it centres on deeper, more disturbing truths about youths trapped in a certain limited form of existence.

Renton is undoubtedly trapped by his addiction and his school girl lover is trapped by her age, a desire to break free and be independent. We all know what it’s like to feel trapped; it’s a very human feeling, despite our supposed freedom. Whether you’re a nurse at a crowded hospital running a gauntlet of noses going off like shotguns of snot, a doctor watching patients with crash dummy heads and vacant eyes or one of thousands of the unemployed youths in this country retreading the same old paths, the same old trenches of memory through the earth, with no concept of a future. We can all get that feeling, and recognise it in others.

Ay na donne get all political pal? Keep it light! Ay?

Ah yes I forgot a character. Robert Carlyle plays Begbie, a moustachioed Scot whose job description reads thus: “playing pool and drinking at the bar, until a minor action by another customer causes him to lose his rag and beat everyone shitless”. Begbie’s probably trapped too, but to be honest his character never seemed much more than smashing entertainment. Literally.
The thing about Renton is that he thinks he’s beaten the rest of us buggers trapped in the game of life, chasing after fat televisions and fancy cars. He thinks that by choosing drugs he’s chosen nothingness and some sort of purer, pleasure filled existence. But like every revolutionary he comes to realise he is as trapped by the system as those embracing it. He needs money for his hits, friends for his sanity. Or maybe not friends, as you’ll see if you watch the film.

Trainspotting is a damn good ride through the monotony of modern existence, with eccentric but hilarious and extremely likeable tour guides. It’s more than your average tourist experience because at times it really gets you to think. And as an exploration of drug culture, Boyle’s direction is suitably dirty, bizarre and haunting, but also responsible and not over the top. You’ll flinch at some of the filth, the needles and most of all McGregor screaming his lungs out at a hallucination of a baby. Trainspotting is not simply a mash-up of visual clichés about getting high though, perhaps because it has such a strong grounding in character.

And so we come to The Wrestler, directed by Darren Aronofsky. Now Darren, as I like to call him, is someone I have a love/hate relationship with. First came the love, as I fell head over heels for the sensuality of Black Swan and then came the hate, when I followed this up with his earlier much praised work, Requiem for a Dream.

One of the reasons I found Trainspotting so refreshing was that whilst it dealt with drugs and it had its strange and psychedelic scenes of intoxication; it did not become the pretentious exercise in filmmaking that was Requiem for a Dream. I will probably be slated for saying it, and it may merely have been the context in which I first saw it (see link), but I really didn’t like that film. I did not see the point to it. Trainspotting seemed to say something far truer about addiction, despite its tongue often being firmly in cheek.

I only bring this up because it all meant that I didn’t know what I was going to get from The Wrestler; dazzling Darren or dopey Darren. The critical buzz around Mickey Rourke’s resurrected corpse meant not a jot, because some of them hated Black Swan and some of them loved Requiem.

I would not go as far as the five star quotes plastered over the cover. I would not call it the “ultimate man film” as FHM did. But it’s undoubtedly a film about a man and ageing, whereas Trainspotting, with hindsight, was a film for boys. Rourke’s Randy “The Ram” Robinson is someone trapped by his past, the legacy of his prime, and the mistakes he made during that ripe period of life.

Perhaps Rourke put in such a praiseworthy performance because he could really inhabit his character. He has been there, more or less. Rather than playing a caricature or a gun toting gangster, Rourke is simply a person here; a human being in decline, or as he says in one moving speech “a broken down piece of meat”. At first I didn’t see what all the fuss about his performance was, but then after a few emotional scenes with a potential lover and ageing stripper (Marisa Tomei) and particularly some heartbreaking confrontations with his daughter (Evan Rachel Wood), Rourke brings Randy to life.

There’s always the danger of melodramatic sentimentality, but the film manages to avoid it, primarily because of the masculine restraint of Rourke’s portrayal. Aside from some brutal wrestling scenes and one careless fuck, this is rather pedestrian territory for Darren after the frenzied, frenetic highs of Requiem and the disorientating dash for beautiful perfection in Black Swan. The Wrestler certainly didn’t grab me and it didn’t inspire the extremes of emotion that Darren’s two other efforts did. It has sporting parallels with Black Swan but lacks the wow factor of that film.

I don’t think there’s necessarily anything that wrong with The Wrestler. In some ways it is refreshing to see a film that shows so many sides of a man’s ordinary life, making his escape from that routine via his passion all the more meaningful. There’s no doubt that performing as a wrestler requires a certain level of very manly commitment to the drama. This film will offset any feminine activities like dusting icing sugar on cupcakes or fashioning paper chains with ease. But it’s so realistic, so dreary and so grim, that this antidote might lead to a dangerous and depressing overdose.

If you watch these back to back, watch Trainspotting last. It’s fun as well as not for the faint hearted. Either film is preferable to pointless precessions though, I’m sure you’ll agree. Never mind God Save the Queen, God save male souls everywhere and best of luck!

Liam Trim (follow me on Twitter)

Movie Review Archive

Wednesday, April 27, 2011

Macho Antidotes to the Royal Wedding – Part 2: United on BBC iPlayer

Liam Trim provides some alternatives to the Royal Wedding in the second of a three part feature...

My second suggestion of anti-Royal Wedding medication for the ordinary man, following the sensational spectacle of Thor, is a single strong dose of BBC drama United, shown on Sunday and now available on iPlayer. If Thor was grounded in fun fantasy then United is rooted firmly in poignant and period storytelling, of the sort the Beeb does so well. In fact with budget cuts beginning to bite, our national broadcaster has made it clear that quality dramas like United and The Crimson Petal and the White are the future of BBC2 in particular. If future projects are as good as these then it’s a wise as well as an economical decision.

United is the story of the tragic Munich air crash that killed most of Manchester United football club’s first team, as well as reporters and staff, after a successful European cup match in Belgrade. The squad’s flight was stopping over in a snowy Munich to refuel and the players and coaching staff were keen to return in time for their league game that weekend, and thus avoid a points deduction. For most football fans the catastrophe that cruelly cut short the life of so many of “Busby’s Babes” is the stuff of familiar legend. I have been a Manchester United fan since the age of 6 and was raised on the fairytales of pure footballers from both before the disaster and after it. The men directly touched by such devastating events forged the foundations for Manchester United to become the world famous and successful club it is today.

Rest assured though, United is a good drama and an absorbing watch, pure and simple. For those without the background in football heritage or even those that can’t tolerate the game, this is a captivating human story of careers, celebrity and comebacks. Most importantly this is an extremely British tale and the perfect anaesthetic for ears bleeding profusely because of the hypocritical and imbecilic and meaningless whining of Americans pleasuring themselves over the blandest, most lifeless 24 hour coverage of the exterior of Bucking-HAM palace.

Despite the subject matter United is not all doom and gloom. For over half an hour from the start we are welcomed into the heart of a football club going from strength to strength. But it’s not about the football; it’s about the characters at the club. We are treated to finely honed BBC costume drama detail, from the 1950s fashions, to the dressing room, to Old Trafford, the Theatre of Dreams itself, rendered lifelike with impressively unnoticeable CGI. Most pleasing of all is the delicious double act formed between David Tennant’s Welsh coach Jimmy Murphy and Dougray Scott’s understated but charismatic portrayal of United’s most celebrated manager, Matt Busby.

Most of the time, Tennant steals the show, as he does in almost everything he’s in. It is by no means one of the more important judges of an actor, but Tennant continually succeeds at accent after accent, this time believably carrying off the musical Welsh tongue. This role also allows him to show off other more vital aspects of his talent too though. He has tremendous fun motivating the players as a coach with vision and then more than copes with the emotional side to the story when the drama hits. The majority of Doctor Who fans may now be fully warming to Matt Smith but Tennant remains a class act and it’s actually refreshing to see him embracing parts as diverse and interesting as this one.

It’s fitting that United is mostly told from the perspective of a young Bobby Charlton. He’s now a Sir and a national treasure, but then he was just a lad that wanted to play football. And he ended up living through a harrowing and traumatic experience. Yet he came out the other side of it and was lucky enough to have been part of the great team before the crash, and the even greater side built from the ashes. Jack O’Connell, who plays the young Charlton here, does a really good job whether he’s stumbling through the plane’s ripped ruins and grimacing at explosions, practicing on the pitch or gazing up in awe at the stadium.

As a production United really does ooze quality. The acting is top notch, the music is touching and the directing beautiful, particularly at the snowy crash site itself and in the dressing rooms. It also deals sensitively with an immensely emotive issue. The question of blame is delicately raised and wisely the film does not nail its opinion to any specific interpretation. Some will blame those who were desperate to play abroad and then make it back home in time for the league match, and indeed Busby blamed himself. Some will blame the league officials who refused to grant a postponement to the fixture after United’s European trip. Some will insist the officials at the airport and the mechanics and the pilots should have taken more care. But the sensible will just accept the terrible tragedy of it all. The enormous grief.

Of course the overwhelming and important cost of the crash was the human one, with so many young men dead. Their families and girlfriends and mates were robbed of their lives prematurely. As a drama United undoubtedly tells that tale. It often seems callous, stupid and emotionally ignorant to talk of the cost to the game of football. I call myself a football fan but much of the time the game leaves me unmoved. I do not live and breathe the game, I no longer care greatly as I used to as a child when one of my favoured teams does poorly. It takes a great occasion or an unusually interesting story, or an exciting match with beautiful passages of play, to truly ignite my interest these days. But there certainly was a significant cost to the game of football after the Munich crash, and it was a cost that mattered almost as much as the loss of their lives. United tells that story too.

It mattered that such a great and talented team was almost completely wiped out, because it mattered to them. It would have mattered to those that died and it mattered to those left behind. It mattered to the fans that mourned them and even the people that knew them. It’s too easy to talk with nostalgia of how football used to be, with starting elevens as opposed to giant squads and meagre salaries and basic training pitches; the modern game is too often ignorantly slated as excessive junk. Watching United though you can see the appeal of that nostalgia, of an old school approach brimming with romance, you can understand those who knew it firsthand ranting and raving at the money making machine that’s replaced it.

Nowadays you wouldn’t get Tennant’s character, a first team coach, ringing round top flight clubs begging for players in the aftermath of a disaster so that the locals could see a game and to maintain the winning philosophy of a club. It just wouldn’t be possible. Or necessary. You wouldn’t get a fairytale quite as magical as the one that swept a ramshackle team, comprised of youngsters and amateur unknowns, to the F.A. Cup Final at Wembley just months after the crash.

I’m not ashamed to admit I cried watching United. I might have been predisposed to an outpouring of emotion because United stirred up a long since cooled love in me for the beautiful game. But I defy anyone not to be moved by such excellent acting, such accurate portrayals of grief and commitment and passion. I have been reminded by United that anything, be it art, table tennis or cartoons, that takes you out of yourself and absorbs you, helping you to forget pain and grief completely just for a moment, is a worthwhile and admirable activity. Something worth fighting for.

The Royal Wedding is more likely to make me vomit than get teary but I know it would be more acceptable to sob down the pub over the achievements of football greats than the nuptials of a posh Prince. So when the women are welling up at the sight of a dress or a bouquet, tell them you’re not dead inside you’d just rather save your sympathy and admiration for real royalty.

Liam Trim (follow me on Twitter)

Movie Review Archive

Tuesday, April 26, 2011

Macho Antidotes to the Royal Wedding – Part 1: Thor 3D at the cinema

Liam Trim provides some alternatives to the Royal Wedding in the first of a three part feature...



If you’re not fed up with the circus yet, you soon will be. Every clowning performer, every newsreader, commentator and gushing crowd member, will be salt rubbed into your severely wounded mood. Gossiping and gawping at two rich strangers is irritating for half an hour, annoying for an evening and soul destroying after days and weeks. Wedding talk is a stressful and pointless nuisance. At the end of this week the womenfolk will be in an unstoppably riotous mood. It will be terrifying.



Your masculinity will be torturously chipped away. The usual refuge, the pub, will be hideously transformed into a paradise of bunting and delicate decoration. When the confetti and the cupcakes and the tiaras get too much, new escape routes will be needed. After the horrors of the day itself, you’ll need to rediscover your true self and chill out as a bloke again.



For the alternatives to the madness, the cures to wedding fever and feral femininity, keep it glued to Flickering Myth. We’ll remind you that there’s good honest entertainment worth living for after a monstrous marriage marathon.



Your first anti-wedding tip then is Kenneth Branagh’s (that’s right the thespian and national treasure, directing a comic book adaptation) eagerly anticipated Marvel epic Thor, in three dimensions courtesy of the now standard issue Elton John specs. After all what could be more manly than a hero with impossibly mahoosive muscles and a badass cape, whose principal superpower is a giant hammer for bashing stuff to bits? He’s a God-like handyman irresistible to women and the envy of lesser men.



I promised myself I wouldn’t resort to atrocious puns to describe the merits and failures of Branagh’s creation, as other reviews have done. But then I thorght, by Odin’s beard there’s no harm in saying that whilst this isn’t quite a thor star film, its plot hammers along with such thunderous gusto that it at least cracks the norse code of decent superhero movies for the most part. The critics are right to muck about with words and have fun with their reviews though; because Thor, whatever its faults, is a fun watch.



Despite the drawbacks of spending much of the running time in the CGI kingdom of Asgard, I found such a different setting mostly refreshing. Gleaming golden palaces, elaborate armour and impossible landscapes are ingredients unavailable to the likes of Batman and Iron Man, no matter how artificial the environment might sometimes seem. Undeniably at times the 3D CGI is visually dazzling and striking. There are even a number of good, thumping action scenes in the eternal realm. As some reviewers have pointed out, setting much of the film in Asgard ensures the audience becomes attached to it, whether they appreciate its over the top beauty or not.



There’s no doubt that the fun factor only truly kicks in when things literally crash down to earth though. There are a good number of gags, nearly all of which are LOL worthy. Thor amusingly thrashes about at the humans he interacts with, struggling to accept he is at the mercy of the mortals. He only really bonds with one of us human plebs, the beautiful and gorgeous (I do not have a crush!) Natalie Portman. She plays a scientist on the verge of some vague but momentous discovery to do with particles and space or something. Thor sees she is clever. And that she’s a woman too. Portman is by no means mesmerising as she is in Black Swan here, but she does the job asked of her by the story, as do Anthony Hopkins and even Chris Hemsworth as Thor, who looked so wooden in the trailer. No I don’t just think she did a good job because she’s hot.



You might like to know the basic thrust of Thor’s plot: Thor heir to throne, Thor seeks revenge on Frost Giants, Thor banished for breaking peace, Thor seeks to find lost hammer, Thor inadvertently falls for hot human scientist, Thor tries to return to save kingdom. I like to think he may have grunted it out bluntly like that. And yes you read that rightly, the bad guys in this are called Frost Giants. They are perhaps Thor’s weakest ingredient; childishly simple foes that are difficult to take seriously. But again they are at least different to standard superhero fare.



The best bits, besides the laughs, following Thor’s fall to earth are two stunning action scenes. The first sees Thor roaring like King Kong as he bashes a bunch of S.H.I.E.L.D agents. He’s trying to get to his beloved magical hammer, which is sealed off by awesome looking white tubes by the guys in suits that will link all Marvel’s superheroes together for the forthcoming Avengers film. The second climatic action scene sees Thor and his warrior friends fleeing from a fire breathing robot despatched by the traitor in Asgard’s camp to kill Thor.



This scene gets the best out of a small and dusty New Mexico town location, by smashing it to pieces with fantastic fiery explosions. The really impressive and surprising thing, especially given all the talk about Thor’s visual style, is the sound the killer robot makes every time it unleashes a fireball; it’s so piercing and deafening that you feel the impact of each blast. My friend violently flinched in surprise at one moment when the thing shaped up to slap something. Then in the aftermath of the destruction the soundtrack and the visuals reach suitably epic proportions for Thor’s big race against time comeback moment.



Thor is of course the God of Thunder, which is fitting given that most superheroes grapple with the stormy consequences of their own God complexes. Needless to say Thor predictably learns his lesson, to put others before yourself is truly heroic blah blah, but in engrossingly epic style. There is just something fun about this film, which makes you reluctant to dwell on its various faults and flaws. Thor ended leaving me wanting more from the character and more from his world, despite the silliness of some of the mythological squabbles. Branagh has not crafted the meaningful art he is accustomed to, but a fun and refreshing thorker of a blockbuster. He may be a prince, but Thor will easily sail your mind away from all things Royal.





Liam Trim (follow me on Twitter)



Movie Review Archive