Friday, December 31, 2010

College Football ATS Picks: South Carolina Looks To Knock Off Florida State

AUBURN, AL - SEPTEMBER 25: Marcus Lattimore  of the South Carolina Gamecocks against the Auburn Tigers at Jordan-Hare Stadium on September 25, 2010 in Auburn, Alabama. (Photo by Kevin C. Cox/Getty Images)The biggest game on the national menu will take place in the Georgia Dome this evening as Florida State locks up with South Carolina for the rights to a 10-win season—the first either team will have seen in quite some time.

South Carolina has fresh memories of their last trip to the Dome—a 56-17 beat down at the hands of Cam Newton and the Auburn Tigers—however this game won't bear any resemblance to that one.

Florida State quarterback, Christian Ponder, is expected to make his triumphant return, but he's no Cam Newton and the Seminoles won't have a Nick Fairley to terrorize quarterback Stephen Garcia.

South Carolina has plenty of weapons at its disposal—from freshman running sensation Marcus Lattimore to future NFL draft pick, Alshon Jeffery—not to mention a defense that is tough against the run and well-rested coming into the contest.

Florida State has shown brilliance on both offense and defense this season, but there are questions about the consistency of both units. Can the Seminoles contain the Gamecock's rushing attack for a full 60 minutes?

Will Christian Ponder be ready to come back at full-strength and infuse the Seminoles' offense with the leadership it needs to win the game?

Both teams have plenty to play for so the only question truly is 'who wants it more'?

ATS picks follow. All lines are courtesy of VegasInsider.com. The 'Lady' is 8-9 in ATS bowl picks thus far.

South Florida at Clemson, Meineke Car Care Bowl: Clemson (-5.5)

Clemson isn't a world-beater, but they field a very tough defense and it's tough to imagine that the Bulls will have an answer for anything the Tigers throw at them today—Da'Quan Bowers should be in for another big game.

The Lady's Pick: Clemson to cover

Notre Dame at Miami Hurricanes, Sun Bowl: Miami (-2.5)

Flip a coin in this game as neither side is in the best shape coming into the contest.

The Irish lost many of their games this season due to inconsistent play and key injury. However, they want to finish the year strong and reset for 2011.

As for Miami, coach Shannon is gone, and it is unclear how many players will be motivated to play their best brand of football without their guy on the sideline.

It's a tough one to call, but the return of Jacory Harris might be the difference in this one.

The Lady's Pick: Miami to cover

Central Florida at Georgia, Liberty Bowl: Georgia (-6.5)

Pay attention to the way Georgia plays the run in this one. The Knights are a strong rushing team behind the trio of Ronnie Weaver, Jeff Godfrey, and Latavius Murray and five of Georgia's six losses this season came as a result of poor run defense biting them in the backside.

As for the Knights, they will have the tough task of defending a Georgia passing game that features, arguably, the best wide receiver in the country in A.J. Green. Look for Aaron Murray to take to the air early in this one—hopefully opening up some room for Washaun Ealey and Carlton Thomas to make a play or two against a tough Knights run defense.

The Lady's Pick: UCF to cover

Florida State at South Carolina, Chick-Fil-A Bowl: South Carolina (-3)

Florida State will see the return of Christian Ponder, but unless the Seminole defense can find an answer for a healthy Marcus Lattimore and a determined Alshon Jeffery, that won't matter much.

While both teams sport good run defenses, the edge has to go to the Gamecocks here as they will likely be the most motivated to play well today—erasing the debacle of the SEC Championship from their memory.

The Lady's Pick: South Carolina to cover





Flickering Myth’s Top 10 Movies of 2010

Well, it’s that time of year again when we’re inundated with critics’ picks for the best films of the past twelve months and - after resisting the urge in 2009 - it’s about time we got in on the act here at Flickering Myth. Rather than presenting individual lists from our writing team we’ve taken everyone’s choices and processed them through a complex algorithm to compile our selection of 2010’s best cinematic offerings (or rather, we gathered together our individual choices and assigned points to each film based on their positions in said lists). So without further ado, let’s begin the countdown of our Top 10 Movies of 2010...

The Wolfman10. The Wolfman (dir. Joe Johnston)

Just managing to fend off competition from Green Zone (dir. Paul Greengrass) and Winter’s Bone (dir. Debra Granik) for tenth place is Joe Johnston’s Universal Monster remake The Wolfman. Released way back in February, The Wolfman stars Benicio del Toro as Lawrence Talbot, an actor who returns to his family estate after the death of his brother and becomes infected with lycanthropy after he is attacked by a wolf. Co-starring are Anthony Hopkins, Emily Blunt and Hugo Weaving, while the creature itself was brought to life by legendary make-up and effects artist Rick Baker.




The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo9. The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo (dir. Niels Arden Oplev)

Adapted from the first instalment of Swedish novelist Stieg Larsson’s best-selling Millennium Trilogy, The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo sees reporter Mikael Blomkvist (Michael Nyqvist) teaming up with troubled computer hacker Lisbeth Salander (Noomi Rapace) to investigate the strange disappearance of a young girl over thirty years earlier. The highest-grossing Swedish movie of all-time with over $104m at the world-wide box office, The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo spawned two sequels and has every chance of appearing in next year’s list with an English language remake from director David Fincher.




Four Lions8. Four Lions (dir. Chris Morris)

The only British film to make the top ten comes courtesy of Brass Eye creator Chris Morris, who made his feature debut with the controversial terrorist satire Four Lions. Written by Morris and Peep Show scribes Sam Bain and Jesse Armstrong, Four Lions follows a group of radicalised British Muslims who decide to become suicide bombers. After a successful premiere at Sundance in January, Four Lions struggled to find a North American distributor (it eventually received a limited release in November) but enjoyed strong returns at the UK box office. Read our review here.





A Prophet7. A Prophet (dir. Jacques Audiard)

Jacques Audiard’s French prison drama A Prophet stars Tahir Rahim as a young Arab man sentenced to six years in a brutal prison, where he soon comes under the protection of a Corsican mafia group and begins to rise through their ranks. A Prophet had already earned a host of accolades prior to its UK release in January, taking home 9 César Awards, the BAFTA for Best Film Not in the English language, the Grand Prix at Cannes and Best Film Award at the London Film Festival, not to mention an Academy Award nomination for Best Foreign Language Film.





Kick-Ass6. Kick-Ass (dir. Matthew Vaughn)

Based on the comic-book series by Mark Millar, Matthew Vaughn’s satirical superhero movie Kick-Ass stirred up quite a storm with outraged critics kicking off about the film’s levels of violence and profanity, particularly with regards to 11 year-old Chloe Moretz’s Hit Girl character. Of course that didn’t put off audiences, with the independently-funded feature more than tripling its $28m budget at the global box office and delivering a damn fine action-comedy to boot. Aaron Johnson stars in the lead role as ‘real-life’ superhero Kick-Ass, and is joined by a strong supporting cast including Nicolas Cage, Christopher Mintz-Plasse and Mark Strong.




Scott Pilgrim vs. the World5. Scott Pilgrim vs. the World (dir. Edgar Wright)

Edgar Wright’s Scott Pilgrim vs. the World may have bombed at the box-office [read our thoughts as to why here] – earning just $47m worldwide from an estimated $60m budget – but the critical consensus was generally positive and the comedy seems destined to gain cult status as it finds an audience on home video. Scott Pilgrim’s (Michael Cera) quest to win the heart of Ramona Flowers (Mary Elizabeth Winstead) by defeating her ‘seven evil exes’ was chosen as film of the year by two of our contributors, which helps it to secure an impressive fifth-placed finish overall. Read our review here.




Shutter Island4. Shutter Island (dir. Martin Scorsese)

Legendary filmmaker Martin Scorsese followed up his Academy Award-winning The Departed with Shutter Island, a psychological thriller based on Dennis Lehane’s best-selling 2003 novel of the same name. Leonardo DiCaprio stars as Teddy Daniels, a US Marshall who ventures to a secluded mental asylum in order to investigate the disappearance of a patient from a locked room. The film – which also stars Mark Ruffalo, Ben Kingsley, Michelle Williams, Emily Mortimer, Max von Sydow and Jackie Earle Haley – went on to give Scorsese a career high in terms of worldwide box office, banking an impressive $294m. Read our review here.




The Social Network3. The Social Network (dir. David Fincher)

The creation of popular social networking site Facebook may not have seemed like the most obvious of source material for a feature film but David Fincher’s drama has received near-universal acclaim and will be looking to make a big impact come awards season. Jesse Eisenberg stars as Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg and is joined by Andrew Garfield, Justin Timberlake, Armie Hammer, Rooney Mara, Max Minghella and Rashida Jones. The Social Network was selected as film of the year by three of our contributors for a third-placed finish overall. You can read our reviews of the film here and here.




Toy Story 32. Toy Story 3 (dir. Lee Unkrich)

Pixar continued its incredible run of critical and commercial success this year with their latest animated masterpiece Toy Story 3, which became the first film from the studio to break the $1b mark at the global box office and more than doubled the combined haul of its two predecessors. Pixar seem to have eschewed the Disney tradition of churning out sub-standard sequels and with Toy Story 3 they delivered one of the most entertaining and moving films of the year (come on, you know you were fighting back the tears towards the end). Read our review here.





Inception1. Inception (dir. Christopher Nolan)

Christopher Nolan’s follow-up to The Dark Knight was described as a ‘smart’ blockbuster, delivering a complex story to compliment the usual action, thrills and excitement expected of big summer movies. The gamble paid off handsomely with audiences flocking to see Leonardo DiCaprio and his team (including Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Ken Watanabe, Ellen Page and Tom Hardy) infiltrate the dreams of a wealthy businessman (Cillian Murphy) to extract corporate secrets. Inception banked a mighty $825m world-wide and topped the lists of four of our contributors, while it just managed to pip Toy Story 3 by a whisker to take the crown as our film of 2010. Read our review here.




Notes…

In all there were sixteen of us who participated, selecting 69 films in total and with eight different titles managing to take home number one spots. Here are our individual picks for best film of 2010…

Jamie Baker – [Rec] 2
Gary Collinson – Toy Story 3
Oli Davis – The Social Network
Jon Dudley – The Social Network
James Ellis – Inception
Louise-Afzal Faerkel – The Killer Inside Me
Amy Flinders – Toy Story 3
DJ Haza – Inception
Trevor Hogg – Inception
Roger Holland – Scott Pilgrim vs. the World
Vicki Isitt - Mary and Max
Tom Jolliffe – Inception
Simon Moore – Scott Pilgrim vs. the World
Luke Owen - Toy Story 3
Cherokee Summer – The Illusionist
Liam Trim – The Social Network


Update - 08/01/11

We've been running a poll since New Year's Eve asking for your votes for your favourite film of 2010 and the results are in. Thanks to the 299 people who took part, and here are the results...

Inception - 40% (121 votes)
Something else, you fools - 20% (61 votes)
Toy Story 3 - 11% (33 votes)
The Social Network - 10% (30 votes)
Shutter Island - 5% (15 votes)
Kick-Ass - 3% (10 votes)
Scott Pilgrim vs the World - 3% (9 votes)
The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo - 2% (8 votes)
A Prophet - 2% (7 votes)
The Wolfman - 1% (5 votes)
Four Lions - 0% (0 votes)

What are your choices for the best movies of 2010? Please feel free to leave your thoughts…

Frustrated Ramblings: Cinema 2010 - The Good, The Bad and The Ugly

DJ Haza reflects on the highs and lows of 2010 with more "Frustrated Ramblings Of An Aspiring Filmmaker"...

As the final days of 2010 pass me by I’ve decided to reminisce and rant about the films that have flickered through my brown eyes over the last 12 months. Some have quite rightly amazed me. Others astounded me. Some were so damned disgusting that it led me to begin writing my series of articles named The Frustrated Ramblings Of An Aspiring Filmmaker. So here goes. I’ll keep it brief. Short and sweet. All killer and no filler. No waffle. Maybe a bit of waffle. No, I shouldn’t waffle. Shit. I’ve waffled!

Firstly, the good. There have been a few films this year that have truly amazed me, had me glued to my seat and fuelled my own ideas and ambitions of filmmaking. Some true masters of their craft have given us some cinematic masterpieces in 2010. And so...

My top 5 films of 2010 are... (drum role)... Inception Christopher Nolan
1. Inception
2. Shutter Island
3. The Social Network
4. The Town
5. Tron: Legacy
Inception was exactly what I want from a visit to my local multiplex. It had me thinking whilst I was watching, talking about it when I left and I couldn’t settle until I had seen it again. It was visually stunning, deep and meaningful, ambiguous and was so well thought out and made by Christopher Nolan, who is fast becoming a cinematic heavyweight. From the opening titles to the closing credits I was glued to the screen. The film could have easily been another hour in length without me feeling bored, fidgeting or going to the toilet. I would have rather wet myself than miss a minute. Accompanying Nolan’s vision was Leonardo DiCaprio’s performance, which as always was stunning. Film of the year!

Close behind was Shutter Island. Again it had me thinking, second-guessing and talking afterwards about a film that had me glued to the screen. I watched Shutter Island in the cinema, on Sky Box Office and then on Blu-Ray and every time I watched it I got something else from it. When you know how it is going to end you can see the hints, tricks and tips that are cleverly incorporated into the story, the setting and the directing. Martin Scorsese’s directing was truly stunning at times when watched with the knowledge of the ending. The scene in which Teddy, played beautifully by DiCaprio, is interrogating the patients in the cafeteria had me grinning from ear to ear. When you know who Dr Sheehan is watch that scene back and see the clues left by Scorsese. Brilliant.

The Social Network David FincherThe Social Network, from first impressions, looked like a film that was going to bore the pants off me. One geek’s dream to create a social network and get some friends! Who cares? Then I found out David Fincher had directed. I was then interested. I watched. I laughed out (a rarity for me). I enjoyed. Immensely. Fincher took the story of a friendless uber-geek working tirelessly to make his new social networking website a success whilst alienating everyone around him and intercut it with two court room battles between the geek and those suing him. And he made it work. More than work. It at no point had me bored, checking my watch or feeling bogged down in various geeks babbling back and forth. On paper the film shouldn’t work. However, It’s definitely a film I’ll be watching again. And again.

Another surprise was The Town. Directed by Ben Affleck, I almost tried not to like it. I mean, more men have walked on the moon than the number of good films Affleck has been in. But I loved it! The story of a group of friends living in the bank robbing capital of the world, Boston, and drifting apart was emotive. Despite him being a bank robber I think a lot of men could empathise with the leading character, Doug, played suprisingly well by Affleck himself. The film worked on several levels and I thoroughly enjoyed it.

Tron: Legacy was a 3D cinematic experience that showed just how far cinema has come since the original Tron blazed a technological trail across Hollywood using computers with less power than a TV remote. The story was pretty basic; bloke gets stuck in a cyber world and has to battle to get out, just as expected. The visual feast that accompanied the film was worth going for and I didn’t even mind the fact that the characters talk non stop to each other so that we understand them, their stories and the cyber world they are stuck in.

The Wolfman posterI also loved The Wolfman, despite every filmmaker I know berating me for even considering it worth watching. It was a generic and clichéd werewolf movie, but it was enjoyable to watch. It didn’t try to be too clever or different and was a sort of homage to classic monster movies of the past that used a dark woods, unbelievably thick mist and simple village folk as story telling tools. I liked it and I don’t care what you think!

Over the course of 2010 I also saw a lot of films that were bad or just out right ugly. Some were poorly written, others poorly shot and some were just plain shite!

Edge of Darkness was okay, but not amazing. Whoop-de-doo that Mel Gibson brought his racist face back to cinema screens. Green Zone was Jason Bourne in Iraq. But boring. And no drama. And hardly any action. Kick-Ass definitely did not kick ass. The main character was boring and I didn’t care about him. From Paris With Love was just inexplicably violent and explosive to the point where I wondered what the hell the film was actually about. Iron Man 2 was a bit too cheesy for my liking. Robin Hood was a let down, but it was always doomed for comparison against Gladiator with Ridley Scott and Russell Crowe teaming up for a period epic. Prince of Persia was Pirates of the Caribbean in the desert. Mildly entertaining, but ultimately pointless. Get Him To The Greek saw Russell Brand under acting in order to play a wild, drug fuelled British rock star. I can’t help but think that the director missed a trick by not letting Brand just go to town with his character and light up the screen in his own twisted way.

Mr Nice posterHowever, my biggest disappointment of 2010 came with my long awaited trip to see Mr. Nice. I’d waited six years since having read the book from cover to cover in only a week whilst hanging on Howard Marks’ every word. I tried not to get overexcited when trotting down to the cinema with my mother in tow. I tried to keep my expectation from running away with me. But despite all this it still sucked. I understand the difficulties involved in adapting a book to film, but so much of Marks’ life was missing. It just felt like fragments of his life thrown together in order to tell a portion of his story as quickly as possible. And the decision to use stock footage and then green screen Rhys Ifans over the top had me tutting in my seat.

I was hoping for a British Blow, but it wasn’t. We weren’t privy to enough of Marks’ life in order to care for him in my opinion. Unlike George Jung in Blow I don’t feel people cared about Marks or empathized with why he did what he did. He just looked like a dope smuggler who was too bone idle or lazy to do anything meaningful with his Oxford education. I shed a tear at the end of Blow because it was such a great and tragic story, especially when he lost his daughter. I shed a tear at the end of Mr. Nice for completely other reasons.

Overall 2010 has been a year of ups and downs in cinema for me, but 2011 is set to kick off with a bang. 127 Hours, True Grit, The King’s Speech, Black Swan and The Green Hornet are all set for launch in the UK over January and I can’t wait. If the year continues with the same quality as January we could be in for a great year. However, knowing how cinema works I’m sure there will still be plenty of films to rant about in 2011. I’ll see you on the other side.

D.J. Haza

Follow my blog at http://djhaza.blogspot.com/
Follow me at http://www.facebook.com/djhaza

Thursday, December 30, 2010

Repetition

A very small fraction of a huge order I am fulfilling (hence, the light blogging). I ran out of surfaces in our home to put these, so now I'm placing in boxes prior to finishing touches and packing...


Holiday photo...

Here's one holiday photo of the Christmas gathering we had at our house this year :)


WRITER'S WRITE...WRITING PARTNERS FEUD



We thought this an appropriate post for all should dance as they bring in the New Year.

DANCE
By
Angelica Hart and Zi

There in the frost of offensive silence, he crossed the room stopping, his keen blue beige eyes instantly thawed that chill. She saw in his broad shoulders a champion, in the cut of his shirt a man of style, and from the tint of the musk of his cologne a man who must have haunted the dreams of so many women. He extended a powerful hand toward her, a hand that bespoke hard work, yet was groomed.

"Dance?"

His voice was deep and rich. That simple query managed to release rushes she hadn't felt for so long. It was 1981, when Peter asked her to prom. She had not expected it, wanted it, but felt he should have asked another. Tonight, like that day she hesitated. This man much like Peter confidently waited for her reply. Eventually, her reply was the same as in 1981. "No!"

Back in high school Peter walked away. This night, this man, lifted the left corner of his mouth creating a charming half-grin, and choose not to retreat. "Let's dance."

He bent at the waist, leaned forward, lifted her from her wheelchair, carried her to the floor, and there they spun and swayed, she held safe in his arms. Found herself easily lost in his massive chest, blanketed by his musk, dreaming of him, and washed in his gentle hum, it the guttural groan of a primal urges. The room's din with the band playing, once uncomfortably loud, became insignificant, and in that moment all was marked, meaningful and telling.

Joyce's friends watched and one became teary. They understood just how beautiful she was. They at the time in their lives where mating and pairing was a priority, and hoped for her. None felt she was at risk of being hurt. They knew this man. Knew his heart. Back in high school Peter was a boy, the wheelchair seemed daunting, but today Peter was a man and could not walk again from the girl who warmed his soul.

We try to touch emotions. We hope we do.

HAPPY NEW YEAR!

We'd love to hear from anyone interested in what we do. Anyone who writes us at angeliahartandzi@yahoo.com and leaves an s-mail address, we will send you a gift and add you to any future mailings.

Angelica Hart and Zi
KILLER DOLLS
SNAKE DANCE
CHASING YESTERDAY
angelicahartandzi@yahoo.com
angelicahartandzi.com

BOOKS can be purchased at
Champagne Books
http://www.champagnebooks.com


Little Fockers tops the UK box office over the Christmas weekend

UK box office top ten and analysis for the weekend of Friday 24th - Sunday 26th December 2010.

It looks like there's still plenty of life in the Meet The Parents franchise as third installment Little Fockers takes the Christmas number one spot with a decent haul of £3m. Little Fockers also manages to repeat the feat over in the States where it pulled in just over $30m this past weekend so expect to see more of the Robert De Niro / Ben Stiller double-act before too long, although surely the series will run out of steam before we get to Meet the Great-Grandparents some time around 2025.

Also enjoying a healthy festive season is The Chronicles of Narnia: The Voyage of the Dawn Treader, which is the only film in the top ten to retain its position from last week as it holds firm in second place with £929k. Less fortunate is Disney's big-budget sci-fi sequel Tron: Legacy, which falls to third after debuting in the top spot last week, while Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1 slips one to fourth and pushes its total gross beyond £46m.

The chart is also home to two other newcomers this week; Bollywood action thriller Tees Mar Khan takes fifth with a strong opening haul of £319k, while Luc Besson's fantasy sequel Arthur and the Great Adventure manages to take in just £83k to finish up in ninth. Meanwhile animated offerings Megamind and Animals United fall one apiece to sixth and eighth respectively, with The Tourist down three to ninth and Burlesque suffering the steepest decline as it plunges four to prop up the chart in tenth.

Number one this time last year: Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel
















































































Pos.FilmWeekend GrossWeek



1Little Fockers
£3,035,7171














































2The Chronicles of Narnia: The Voyage of the Dawn Treader
£929,9583


















































3Tron: Legacy£486,0652


































































4Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1£416,5566
































































5Tees Mar Khan
£319,8701








































































6Megamind
£303,8614




































































7The Tourist£164,8363


























































8Animals United
£157,8582












































































9Arthur and the Great Adventure
£83,8751








































































10Burlesque£81,5742














































































Incoming...

With Peter Weir's epic WWII tale The Way Back (cert. 12A) and family adventure Gulliver's Travels (cert. PG) both opening this past Sunday and Love and Other Drugs (cert. 15) arriving yesterday, there's little in the way of new releases to look forward to this coming weekend. In fact, the only 'new' film hitting screens is a limited reissue of the Howard Hawks classic The Big Sleep (cert. PG) starring Humphrey Bogart and Lauren Bacall, which opens on Friday.

U.K. Box Office Archive

DVD Review - The Undercover War (2009)

The Undercover War (a.k.a. Réfractaire), 2009.

Directed by Nicolas Steil.
Starring Grégoire Leprince-Ringuet, Arthur Dupont, Guillaume Gouix, Pierre Niney, Carlo Brandt, Marianne Basler and Judith Davis.

The Undercover War
SYNOPSIS:

In Nazi-occupied Luxembourg a young man chooses to embark upon a clandestine life in the Resistance and joins other deserters in an abandoned mine.

The Undercover War
The Undercover War was Luxembourg’s submission for the 82nd annual Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film, and while it failed to make any kind of impact in that particular category it must surely be a front runner for Most Misleading Cover of 2011. Released internationally as Réfractaire, you’d surely be forgiven for picking this up at your local branch of ASDA and expecting your typical run-of-the-mill WWII war film full of tanks, fighter planes, explosions and Nazis. However, there are no tanks here, no fighter planes, no explosions, and really only a handful on Nazis, for this isn’t your typical run-of-the-mill WWII film. Instead director Nicolas Steil delivers an interesting character-driven coming-of-age drama which takes a step back from the front lines to focus on the devastating cost of war to civilian life, an area that is so often overlooked in the years following Saving Private Ryan’s reinvention of the war movie.

After returning home to Luxembourg from a German university, François (Grégoire Leprince-Ringuet) is faced with the dilemma of being drafted into the Wehrmacht where he will be sent to the front to kill Allied soliders, or resisting and giving up his life to go into hiding. François opts for the latter and is taken by a family friend to an old abandoned mine that houses a number of deserters, known as ‘réfractaires’ (‘refractory people’, or to use the American translation, ‘draft dodgers’). Tainted by the actions of his father, who had collaborated with the Germans before being murdered, François has to earn the trust of the men and eventually begins to serve the resistance movement, where he soon discovers that the struggle to liberate his homeland is equally as dangerous as the battle on the front lines.

Complimenting the main storyline are a number of interesting and well-rounded supporting characters such as the lonely and promiscuous collaborator’s wife Malou (Marianne Basler), whose shame at her husband’s actions drives her into the arms of François, and fellow réfractaire Jacques (Carlo Brandt), a Communist extremist who looks to stamp his authority on the mine regardless of the cost to others. The cast all deliver believable performances, particularly those ‘buried alive’ in the mine, and you really get a sense of the desperation the men must have faced in such trying circumstances. This is no doubt helped by the fact that Steil and his crew shot twelve-hour days on location in actual disused mines, while production designer Christina Schaffer does a fine job of recreating 1940s Luxembourg for the exterior scenes.

Although some elements of The Undercover War are a tad clichéd – particularly François’ journey from timid student to resistance fighter – Steil does a good job of tying everything together and creating a thought-provoking piece that, while it was never likely to trouble the Academy voters, certainly provides something a little different from usual WWII efforts. As I implied at the start of this review, I’m sure a number of people will be disappointed based on their expectations from the cover art, but if you can get past that you might be surprised by what The Undercover War has to offer.

The Undercover War is released on DVD on January 3rd, 2011.

Gary Collinson

Movie Review Archive

Wednesday, December 29, 2010

The NCAA Responds To Criticisms Regarding Favoritism

Hmmmm...it seems the NCAA does know how to listen—sometimes.

This afternoon a full statement was released by the NCAA regarding it's treatment of both the Cam Newton and the Ohio State situations.

In regards to Newton, "...had Cam Newton's father or a third party actually received money or benefits for his recruitment, Cam Newton would have been declared ineligible regardless of his lack of knowledge."

Okay, well, that clears THAT up. Note to parents, boosters, and agents, the NCAA policy should be understood as follows: there's nothing wrong with asking for money or favors. Just don't actually take anything.

As for Ohio State, they had this to say,

"There have been questions as well since last week related to the withholding policy and student-athlete reinstatement for NCAA championships and bowl games. This policy was developed and implemented by the Division I membership...it allows for suspending a reinstatement condition in specific instances involving NCAA championships or bowl games. It recognizes the unique opportunity these events provide at the end of a season, and they are evaluated differently from a withholding perspective for student-athlete reinstatement. In the Ohio State situation, the facts are consistent with the established policy."

So, basically, if you're going to violate a rule, wait until the season is over.

Get real, Mr. Emmert, the mere fact that the NCAA felt a need to release this statement is a sure sign that you know there are some gross inconsistencies in what you are doing.

Personally, I'm still not buying what you're selling...it's doubtful that many others will either.

Nice try, though.




WATCH: Oregon Ducks "Take It All" Music Video

Is he a rapper? A singer? A producer?

Whatever he thinks he is, this video is his contribution to the 2010 Oregon Ducks and their trip to the National Championship game in January.

My advice would be for him to have a nice backup plan—just in case this whole rapper/singer/video production thing doesn't work out to his liking.




College Football: Forget Integrity, We Just Want The Money


After the story broke about Ohio State players selling their jerseys and accepting favors, many of us watched and waited to see what the all-mighty NCAA would do to punish the players and the university—at the very least we expected the six offenders to sit for the Sugar Bowl.

Well, what happened instead is yet another example of how the NCAA is just another bully masquerading as an organization of order.

Ohio State was given the option of delaying suspensions until the start of the 2011 season, and now that the representatives of the Sugar bowl have spoken, we know why—money.

Said Sugar Bowl CEO, Paul
Hoolahan,
"I made the point that anything that could be done to preserve the integrity of this year's game, we would greatly appreciate it...that appeal did not fall on deaf ears, and I'm extremely excited about it, that the Buckeyes are coming in at full strength and with no dilution."
Must be nice.

While it's easy to understand Hoolahan's motives—he is a business man after all—it's less easy to explain away the obvious double-standard of the NCAA in this case.

Are they the governing body of college football or not?

A.J. Green sat four games for selling his jersey, Anthony Dasher missed four for taking a $1500 loan, and last season, Dez Bryant missed most of his final season for talking to Deion Sanders...but Ohio State gets the option of delaying punishment because some bowl official doesn't want another lackluster BCS game on his hands?

Nice job of getting tough, Mr. Emmert. Here we thought you were bringing balance to the NCAA—as it's new president—but as it turns out, you just brought a bigger checkbook.

What a joke.



Getting to Know Author Scotty Cade

Why don't you start with telling us a little about yourself? What genre do you write in and why?

I started my life in the city of New Orleans, Louisiana, better known as the Big Easy and was raised along with my two sisters in a very small neighborhood along the mighty Mississippi River.  I was undeniably a momma’s boy and enjoyed a lot of alone time with my stay-at-home mother before my younger sister was born, while my older sister was at school and my Dad was at work.  I spent fun days doing chores around the house riding on the back of her vacuum cleaner singing Etta James songs.  When the chores were done, we settled down for story time.  I truly believe that my love of reading and eventually writing was born.  But all that came to a horrible end when my baby sister was born and I no longer had Mom all to myself.  Then another horrible incident almost ruined my life, my sixth birthday and the first grade.  Oh Boy, did I hate going to school.  I went, but I went kicking and screaming literally every morning until I was seven, my poor mother.  Having to share my mother with my newborn sister and having to attend school left us very little time together and I truly felt deserted, but I really showed her, I jumped ship into my Father’s world.  I was the only boy, so it was the logical next step.  Happy again to be the center of someone’s world, I soaked it up every day.

My father raised quarter horses as a hobby and some of my fondest memories surround that time in my life.  When we were older, on weekends the entire family would pack up the horses and head to local horse shows where, my father, my younger sister and I would compete in barrel racing and cutting.  But my most cherished memories are of my father and me taking long horseback rides along the levies of the river enjoying sandwiches and snacks prepared by my mother.  We spent long summer days of riding and jabbering about this or that or just enjoying a comfortable silence.  It wasn’t really the conversation or the silence that was important to me, but the interest he took in my life that thirty five years later, still makes my heart swell.  After a brief marriage, one of those special moments is where I found the nerve to come out to my Father, one of the hardest things I’ve ever done in my life.   He did much better that I did and in the end wanted only my happiness.  He’s been nothing but supportive and non-judgmental of my life and I will remember that as long as I live.  Unfortunately, the lights in my life got a little dimmer when my loving mother died five years ago of colon cancer and dimmed yet again when my Father was diagnosed with Alzheimer’s three years ago.  Fortunately, he still lives in our family home near my sisters and they act as his primary caregivers, but he has really good days and really bad days.  He does his best and that’s all we can ask of him.

Okay, enough of the sappiness.  I attended Louisiana State University, majoring in Marketing, but unfortunately never graduated.  I was lucky enough to be offered a job to manage a very large well established furniture store in my hometown and went for it.  I stayed with company for five years and started making my way up the corporate ladder.  I joined high-tech company in New Orleans, and was transferred to Atlanta, GA where I met the love of my life.  Kell and I have been together fourteen years now and we’re still going strong. 

I’ve worked for a total of six companies throughout my twenty-five year career and ended up as the Senior Vice President of Worldwide Marketing and Public Relations for a very large company based in Atlanta, GA.  Throughout my career I focused my writing capabilities on Marketing materials, Annual Reports, Press Releases, radio scripts, broadcast media, and the likes, but always had novels running around wild in my head.  Kell and I both gave up the corporate rat race and bought a small hotel and restaurant on the island of Martha’s Vineyard in Massachusetts. Can you imagine two southern boys ending up in New England?  I should think not, boy what a culture shock.  But after six years, we managed to find our way and are healthy and happy in our environment.  About three years into our venture, we hit burn-out and hired a general manager to run our business while we took a year off.  That is when I started my first Novel, Final Encore, and the rest his history.  After that first year off, Kell and I enjoyed our freedom so much that we purchased a forty-two motor yacht called “One Mo Time,” which is now where most of my writing is done.  We travel the waters of New England all summer long with our Shetland Sheepdog, Mavis and in October we cruise down south to Charleston, SC for the winter.

I write in the M/M Romance Genre because the ideas for books keep coming and I have so much in my head that wants to come out, but my fingers are just not fast enough to get it all down.  So I dance the dance between my fingers and brain on a daily basis and can only hope for the best. Being from the south and a lover of commitment and fidelity, most of my characters find their way to long healthy relationships, however long it takes them to get there.  I believe that in the end, the boy should always get the boy.  After all I got mine.
boy should always get the boy. After all, I got mine.


What comes first for you when you sit down to write a book? Plot or Characters?

IN my first book, Final Encore, the characters came first and the plot developed as I went along.  However, with my next several novels, the first being Wings of Love, the plot came before the characters and I loved the characters so much that they are all recurring in the following three, Treasure of Love, Bounty of Love and Foundation of Love.

Do you "cast" your characters using pictures or actors to help inspire you when you're writing?
In some cases I always know what the main characters look like in my head as I writing about them, but for the secondary characters, I sometimes use faces I’ve seen in magazines or people I k now in real life.

How long does it take you to finish a book from start to finish?

Usually about three months if I get to write a few hours every day.  Sometimes the research takes up a good portion of that time, but the story is already developed and the actual writing goes very quickly.

What are you working on now?

In September I finished my second novel, “Wings of Love” and it is about to enter the editing stage and I’m currently finishing up “Treasure of Love,” which is the second book in the “Love” series.

If there was a soundtrack to your latest novel, what genre/songs would be included?

Once you’re read Final Encore you will immediately know it would be country music.  I’m in the process of developing a playlist on iTunes readers can download if they like the music referenced in the book.

Which of your characters would you most likely fall for if they were real?

It would be without a doubt, Billy Eagan from Final Encore.  He is a good man that loves with all of his heart and would anything for anyone.

What do you feel are the benefits of the new electronic readers such as Kindle 2 or Sony Digital Book Reader to the environment?

Speed and convenience.

What character (s) in any of your books is most like you?

I think Jack Cameron from Wings of Love is most like me.  He’s a proud man.  He’s real, stubborn, impulsive, gentle and loving.

What is the most ridiculous thing that you have thought about doing to any of your characters but never did?

I came very close to killing a character off recently, but couldn’t bring myself to do it.  He just wasn’t doing what I wanted him to do, so I almost did him in.  Then I listened and let him do what he was supposed to do and everything worked out in the end.

What is your favorite Ice Cream flavor?

Vanilla

If you could have been the servant to any famous person in history, who would that be and why?
John Steinbeck – I so enjoyed his books and would have loved to have had the opportunity to get to know him and soak up whatever knowledge he was willing to share

Where can we find you on the ‘Net?

Face Book
Twitter
www.amazon.com

Sneak Peek into Final Encore
Dreamspinner Press
Buy HERE
M/M Contemporary

When hunky aspiring country singer Billy Eagan heads to Nashville in search of his big break, a relationship and love are the furthest things from his mind. Taking a foreman's job at the Lazy H ranch and not knowing how he will be accepted, Billy decides to fly under the radar and stay as closeted as he can without denying who he really is. It's immediately confirmed that he made the right decision when he discovers that homophobia is still alive and well in Tennessee.

Then Billy gets his break and meets gorgeous record label executive Ian Dillon. Their worlds collide both professionally and personally, and Billy falls hard. But Ian is still haunted by the mysterious betrayal of his one and only lover, and knowing Billy possesses the power to emotionally destroy him, Ian decides to cut his losses and simply walk away. Determined not to give up on the man he loves, Billy secretly starts to unravel the past and quickly finds that it's not what it appears. Can Billy rescue Ian’s heart, or will bigotry and hatred win over love?

Excerpt:

BILLYS drive from New Orleans to Nashville was long and uneventful. The uninterrupted hours of interstate, with country radio stations fading in and out, gave him a great deal of time to plan a strategy, at least a short-term strategy. The first day he arrived he would find a hotel, look for a day job to help with expenses, and then look for a more suitable place to live.

As the first few days passed, he missed his family terribly but was nonetheless energized with the infinite possibilities of the unknown. Nashville was his new home, and for as long as it would have him, he was happy to be there. The first week, as planned, he searched the want ads for a position that would sustain him financially. He answered several ads and, within a few days, had a great lead.

The position was for a foreman at a large horse farm in Mount Juliet, just outside of Nashville, called the Lazy H Ranch. He set up an appointment to meet the owner at ten o’clock the next morning. It wasn’t his dream job, of course, but it would pay the bills until he found something in the music business.

When Billy turned in under the large iron arch etched with “The Lazy H Ranch,” he looked down at his watch to confirm he was right on time, nine forty-five. Billy drove down the dust-covered road, and after a half mile or so, he saw two large barns on either side of the drive with what looked like an old farm house that he assumed was used for command central. When he got out of his truck, he was looked over, more than greeted, by a rough and unfriendly looking sort. The man was short and stocky, carrying about thirty extra pounds on his frame. His skin was scarred from years of acne, and his teeth were stained from what appeared to be chewing tobacco, as indicated by the Styrofoam cup he spit into. Hoping this wasn’t the owner; Billy introduced himself and learned the man was a ranch hand named Buck Stevens. Buck directed him to wait near the east barn and someone would be with him shortly.

Billy waited around for about forty-five minutes, and no one approached him. He was about to go back and remind Buck that he was still waiting when he saw a tall, ruggedly handsome man walking in his direction. The man, who reminded him of an older version of the Marlboro Man from the old cigarette commercials, walked up and offered his hand.

“Hi, I’m Jules James. I’m the owner of the ranch. Are you William Eagan, by any chance?”
“Yes, sir, but I go by Billy.”

The two shook hands and looked each other over for a few seconds before Jules broke the silence. “I had just about given up on you, son. I thought your interview was at ten o’clock.” 

“It was, sir,” Billy replied. “I arrived at nine forty-five, and Buck told me to wait at the east barn and someone would be with me in a minute. I was just about to go back and see Buck when I saw you walking over.”

“That’s funny,” Jules said. “I told Buck to have you meet me at the west barn. I have a mare about to foal and I want to be there in case there are any problems.”

“I’m sorry about the confusion, sir,” Billy said. “Would you like me to come back?” 

“No problem,” Jules answered. “Why don’t you walk with me to the west barn and we can have a chat along the way.”

Tuesday, December 28, 2010

Visual Linguist: A Darren Aronofsky Profile (Part 2)

With his latest feature Black Swan currently on release in North America, Trevor Hogg profiles the career of filmmaker Darren Aronofsky in the second of a two-part feature... read part one here.

The Fountain poster“I walked out of The Matrix [1999] and I was thinking, ‘What kind of science fiction movie can people make now?’,” marveled Brooklyn born filmmaker Darren Aronofsky. “The Wachowski Brothers took all the great sci-fi ideas of the twentieth century and rolled them into a delicious pop culture sandwich that everyone on the planet devoured.” The solution arrived in the form of a college buddy who had left neuroscience to become a writer. “I remember Darren saying, ‘How cool would it be to cut from a battle scene in some historical period to a man traveling alone in space for an unknown reason?’,” remarked Ari Handel who co-wrote the script for The Fountain (2006). “To convince Warner Bros. to give us the big budget to make this very experimental film, we knew we needed real stars.” Brad Pitt (Fight Club) and Cate Blanchett (Robin Hood) were originally signed to be the leads in the initial $75 million production that was to feature three stories: a present day scientist and his cancer-stricken wife, a conquistador and his queen, and a space traveler who meditates on his past love. Elaborate sets were built including a ten story pyramid on the Gold Coast of Australia. The production started to unravel when Brad Pitt and the studio demanded extensive script revisions. Matters got worse when the science fiction fantasy lost the financial backing of Village Roadshow and New Regency. In 2002, the troubled cinematic endeavor collapsed when seven weeks before principle photography was to begin Pitt left. “After working together for two and half years, Brad had lost trust in me and faith in the project,” admitted Aronofsky who suffered a near mental breakdown.

Escaping to India and China for a self-imposed month long exile, the filmmaker returned to New York where he sat for months playing Xbox snowboarding games. Looking at the series of research books for the movie, the director came to a final conclusion. “I could feel that The Fountain was not out of my blood,” confessed Darren Aronofsky. “And then I remembered I don’t have to write for the studio or Brad Pitt or any other movie star. I decided to start acting like an independent filmmaker again.” Realizing he would have to significantly scale back his vision in order to secure the necessary financing, Aronofsky hired Kent Williams to create a graphic novel based on the original screenplay which was published by DC Comics in 2005. “If that many people had tried to shut me down, I would have believed them and given up,” confessed actress Rachel Weisz (The Constant Gardener) who was recruited to play the female lead in the revised version. “But Darren has a kind of tenacity that I’ve never come across before – tenacity or madness. So The Fountain didn’t have Brad Pitt anymore, for however many gazillions he cost. Writing a cheaper version of the movie let Darren take a more indie route to getting it made.” Selected to replace Brad Pitt was an actor whom Darren Aronofsky saw performing in the Broadway musical The Boy from Oz, Hugh Jackman (X-Men).

The Fountain Darren Aronofsky“The whole approach of my team was to take old-school techniques and street technology and figure out how to do something fresh and original with them,” stated the director. “No matter how good CGI looks at first, it dates quickly. But 2001 [1968] holds up. So I set the ridiculous goal of making a film that would reinvent space without using CGI.” Warner Bros., which was anxious to recoup its initial $20 million investment, was skeptical about choosing practical effects over computer generated ones. “The studio gave Darren a hard time,” stated Peter Parks, a marine biologist and photographer who, along with his son, runs a special effects company. “Nobody believed he could make this film without CGI. The studio thought he was crazy. He had to fly that reel across the Atlantic five or six times.” To create the nebula scenes, a device used by the Parks called a microzoom optical bench, that has ability to magnify a microliter of water up to 500,000 times, was deployed. “When these images are projected on a big screen, you feel like you’re looking at infinity. That’s because the same forces are at work in the water – gravitational effects, settlement, refractive indices – are happening in outer space.” Peter Parks believed Aronofsky made the right decision. “The CGI guys have ultimate control over everything they do. They can repeat shots over and over and get everything to end up exactly where they want it. But they’re forever seeking the ability to randomize, so that they’re not limited by their imaginations. I’m incapable of faithfully repeating anything, but I can go on producing chaos until the cows come home.”

“On the set, I got to meet a different person from the Darren I knew at home,” remarked Rachel Weisz. “He got us to do some really crazy shit. Darren just keeps the cameras rolling, take after take, which pushed me and Hugh to places of extreme vulnerability and nakedness. It was sexy to see someone be so good at what they do.” Ellen Burstyn and Mark Margolis, who both appeared in Requiem for a Dream (2000), star in the epic with Sean Patrick Thomas (Honeydipper), Donna Murphy (The Astronaut’s Wife), Ethan Suplee (American History X), Cliff Curtis (Whale Rider), and Stephen McHattie (A History of Violence). Costing $35 million The Fountain earned $16 million worldwide; the story, partly inspired by the parents of Aronofsky being diagnosed with cancer within weeks of each other (they successfully recovered), received a nomination from the Golden Globes for Best Original Score, and competed for the Golden Lion at the Venice Film Festival.

The Wrestler poster“The idea of doing a movie about a wrestler had been floating around in my head for six or seven years,” remarked Darren Aronofsky who made the observation upon graduating from film school that no one had given the sport a serious cinematic treatment. “I started to develop some of the ideas with producer Scott Franklin and discovered he was a bigger wrestling fan as a kid than I was.” Aronofsky added, “When you meet someone who ten or fifteen years ago was playing in front of 50,000 people and now they’re suddenly in front of 200 people, they’re not just doing if for the money. They’re doing it also to hold onto their craft and the glory. It’s really dramatic.” The Wrestler (2008) revolves around a retired professional wrestler who is drawn back to the ring with the goal of making a comeback. “It was a very hard role to cast,” admitted the Brooklyn native. “[I needed] someone to pull off the humour as well as the sadness and tragedy.” Aronofsky made a controversial choice. “No one believed in Mickey Rourke [The Rainmaker]. He has no value as a commodity. Well, I sat with him and looked into his eyes. His eyes aren’t dead. They’re alive, yearning, thinking.” The director did have some doubts about his leading man. “He’s a big guy but he’s nowhere the size of these wrestlers; he had to put on thirty-five pounds of muscle. So when I first met him, I didn’t know if he could do something like that, and [after] six months of lifting and five thousand calories, he did it.” Rourke impressed the filmmaker with his acting talent. “When you meet him, he has all this armor on him, but that’s because inside he is soft as jelly and he has such a big heart. Technically, he’s an incredible actor and completely in control of his craft.”

Completing the cast are Marisa Tomei (My Cousin Vinny), Evan Rachel Wood (Thirteen), Todd Barry (Road Trip), Mark Margolis, and Judah Friedhandler (Date Movie) along with professional wresters such as Ernest Miller, Ron Killings, Kevin Matthews, Johnny Valiant, Tommy Rotten, Rob Eckos, Necro Butcher, Ref Hanson, and Danny Inferno. “We put on real wrestling promotions and put on the matches,” revealed Darren Aronofsky regarding the guerilla filmmaking approach he adopted for the $6 million production. “When the [wrestling] match was over, me, Mickey and the camera woman would run out into the ring. We’d shoot a piece of the [fake] match, [and] leave.” The director sought to achieve a documentary tone for the picture. “I did a lot of preparation but I didn’t come to set with a shot list. I just waited for the actors to create what they were going to do on set. I really wanted to be open to what they were doing and then figure out how to photograph it.” Aronofsky gave an example. “We were backstage with the wrestlers and I said, ‘Hey, guys just talk about your matches’ and we just shot it.” Some things were staged such as the fight sequences. “It was an interesting sound issue because the hits are fake in one way but they’re real as well, in the sense that Mickey was actually getting hit but he wasn’t getting hit full-force like a real wrestler.”

The Wrestler Mickey Rourke Darren AronofskyAsked about incorporating a stripper played by Marisa Tomei into the storyline, Darren Aronofsky replied, “The truth of the matter is that when real wrestlers are done with their matches, they usually take their gate and go to the strip club.” The filmmaker went on to say, “The more we thought about it – an aging stripper and an aging wrestler have a lot of similarities. They’re both onstage using their bodies and have stage names. They both create a fantasy for the audience. They’re both endangered by time.” The character portrayed by Tomei serves a dual purpose. “As much as she is a romantic interest, she is [also] a mentor for him.” On selecting the Oscar-winning performer for the role, Aronofsky remarked, “She’s often cast as being very sweet and I liked the fact that she played against it.” The three years spent developing the script with the former editor of The Onion, Robert Siegel, paid off for the director as the drama grossed $45 million worldwide and became an awards circuit sensation. The Wrestler won the Golden Lion at the Venice Film Festival and received Academy Award nominations for Best Actor (Mickey Rourke) and Best Supporting Actress (Marisa Tomei). The BAFTA Awards presented Mickey Rourke with Best Actor while nominating Marisa Tomei for Best Supporting Actress. At the Golden Globes the picture won Best Actor – Drama (Mickey Rourke) and Best Original Song while competing for Best Supporting Actress (Marisa Tomei). The Gotham Awards nominated The Wrestler for Best Film whereas Independent Spirit Awards lauded it with Best Cinematography, Best Feature and Best Male Lead (Mickey Rourke). On the union front, Mickey Rourke received a Screen Actors Guild Awards nomination and the Writers Guild of America handed the film a nomination for Best Original Screenplay.

Black Swan poster“At one point, way before I did The Wrestler,” remarked Darren Aronofsky, “I was actually developing a project that was about a love affair between a ballet dancer and a wrestler, and then it split into two movies.” The director hired screenwriters to rewrite the script called The Understudy by Andres Heinz (Origin of the Species) which was about off-Broadway actors and explored the idea of an individual being haunted by a double. Developing the psychological thriller, about a ballerina (Natalie Portman) who competes for the dual roles of the innocent White Swan and the sensual Black Swan in a New York City production of Swan Lake, was initially hindered by the lack of cooperation from those professionally involved with the performing art. “For people that do ballet, ballet is their universe and they’re not impressed with movies. I did find dancers that shared their stories with me, some retired, [and] some working. Eventually, I got to stand backstage when the Bolshoi came to Lincoln Center, standing in the wings watching some of the greatest dancers in the world. I got to see some amazing athletes up close and experience what they were going through.” Aronofsky added, “For me what’s so interesting about ballet is these athletes have done it for years – some of them start at four or five years old – and they make it so effortless.”

A serious issue the filmmaker had to deal with was securing the necessary financing for the $13 million production. “Having Natalie Portman [Beautiful Girls], a legitimate movie star, Vincent Cassel [Eastern Promises], an international movie star, and Mila Kunis [The Book of Eli], a big domestic star, and my supporting cast of Barbara [Hershey] and Winona [Ryder], I didn’t think it would be as hard. It was a nightmare.” On the other hand, attaching Portman to the fledging project was an easy matter for the director. “I am trying to find roles that demand more adulthood from me because you can get stuck in a very awful cute cycle as a woman in film, especially being such a small person,” stated Natalie Portman who has longed to star in Black Swan (2010) even since a fateful meeting with Aronofsky in Times Square. “We started talking about it in 2002 when I was still in college. Darren had a very specific idea. What he told me in our first meeting became what the movie ended up being.”

Black Swan Natalie Portman Darren AronofskyPortman was not entering into unfamiliar territory. “I did ballet until I was twelve then I stopped when I started to take acting seriously.” However, what the actress did find difficult was the amount of preparation required for the part. “Physically I trained starting a year ahead of time, and then the six months prior to [shooting] the film went into a hypertraining where I was doing five hours a day of ballet and cross-training with swimming.” All the work was worthwhile in the eyes of director Darren Aronofsky. “She was able to pull it off. Except for wide shots when she has to be en pointe for a real long time, it’s Natalie on-screen. I haven’t used her double a lot.” As for the notorious love-making scene with her co-star Mila Kinus, Natalie Portman stated, “Nina really doesn’t know who she is – she an ego without an identity, living to please other people and seeing herself through their eyes. This is the first time she lets go – her first real moment of finding pleasure for herself.” Portman enjoyed working with Aronofsky. “Darren gave us these really complicated characters and… the freedom to bring what we wanted to the roles.” The director was equally praiseworthy of his star. “One of the best things about the film is the casting of Natalie. She took the part and ran with it. I don’t know if when I was working with the writers we were consciously channeling Natalie or Natalie somehow transformed herself to the part, but they grew together.”

“The best thing with this movie is that everyone seems to be having a strong visceral response to Darren’s filmmaking,” stated Natalie Portman. “It’s both thought provoking, emotional and pure entertainment.” Screening for the first time at the 2010 Venice Film festival, Black Swan received a long standing ovation and Mila Kunis won the Mastroianni Prize for best emerging artist. Kirk Honeycutt of The Hollywood Reporter wrote, “You might howl at the sheer audacity of mixing mental illness with the body-fatiguing, mind-numbing rigors of ballet, but its lurid imagery and hellcat competition between two rival dancers is pretty irresistible.” He added, “[The] White Swan/Black Swan dynamics almost work, but the horror movie nonsense drags everything down the rabbit hole of preposterousness.” Mike Goodridge from Screen Daily observed in his review, “She [Portman] captures the confusion of a repressed young woman thrown into a world of danger and temptation with frightening veracity.”

Darren AronofskyReuniting with Hugh Jackman, the moviemaker is helming The Wolverine (2011) which sees Jackman reprise his role as the Marvel Comics superhero. Wolverine travels to Japan to train with a samurai warrior. Darren Aronofsky has been quick to point out that the action picture, which is based on the script by Christopher McQuarrie (The Usual Suspects), should be viewed as a “one-off” rather than a sequel. Also, in development for the director is a cinematic adaptation of an online serial by Max Barry; as it currently stands, the cybernetic thriller Machine Man will be released in 2012.

“It’s not about taking chances; it’s about making memorable films,” remarked Darren Aronofsky. “You’re in the world with so much media, so many distractions, that you have to give people something they’re not going to forget.” Along with declaring Terry Gilliam (Brazil) and Roman Polanski (The Ghost Writer) to be his heroes, the Brooklyn native admires the work of Tim Burton (Alice in Wonderland), David Fincher (The Social Network), and Paul Thomas Anderson (There Will Be Blood) who are “interesting filmmakers making films on a big level within the [Hollywood] system.” Having to prove himself with every movie he makes is nothing new for the director. “There’s always been a lot of pressure and tension on the line. If Pi [1998] hadn’t worked out, I have no idea what my career would be. I don’t think I would have gotten another shot at it. If Requiem of a Dream hadn’t worked out, they would have called me a ‘one-hit wonder with a sophomore slump.’” Upon contemplating his career choices, Darren Aronofsky replied, “I try to choose the road that I have the most passion for because then you can never really blame yourself for making the wrong choices.” As for some words of wisdom for aspiring filmmakers, Aronofsky remarked, “Ultimately, every film has its own visual language. You have to figure out what the theme is and then apply style to it.”

For more on Darren Aronofsky visit his official website and blog, along with the fansites Darren Aronofsky Online and Aronofsky Films.

Be sure to read our review of Black Swan, and visit the official site.

Be sure to check out the screenplay for The Wrestler, along with a preview of The Fountain graphic novel and the official site of Machine Man.


Trevor Hogg is a freelance video editor and writer who currently resides in Canada.